- From: Rich Schwerdtfeger <richschwer@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 22:19:05 -0400
- To: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
- Cc: ARIA WG <public-aria@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 3 March 2017 02:19:42 UTC
My 2 cents is that unless there are new roles that require mapping and they follow our rules for extensions they should publish their own module. Best, Rich Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 2, 2017, at 11:20 AM, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org> wrote: > > With the merger of the IDPF with W3C and influx of W3C Members interested in digital publishing, a Digital Publishing Working Group is being proposed. One deliverable would be a 2.0 version of Digital Publishing ARIA Module (the ARIA WG currently has the 1.0 version in CR), and the question has come up whether the ARIA WG prefers that be a joint deliverable or just a deliverable of the new DPub WG. Does anybody have opinions on that question? Michael
Received on Friday, 3 March 2017 02:19:42 UTC