- From: Joseph Scheuhammer <clown@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 11:16:19 -0500
- To: public-aria@w3.org
On 2017-01-27 10:59 AM, Steve Faulkner wrote: > On 27 January 2017 at 15:55, Gunderson, Jon R <jongund@illinois.edu > <mailto:jongund@illinois.edu>> wrote: > > One example that was raised in the APG teleconference last week, > is when someone is in a dialog box, the “enter” key is associated > with the close button, so if someone is on a different button in > the dialog box and presses “enter”, instead of activating the > button action, the activate the close button and close the dialog > box. > > > This sounds like a coding issue rather than a reason to modify a > standardized interaction pattern for button. > > If a control that typically consumes the enter key press (such as a > button) has focus, then the key press event should not bubble up to > the dialog. > I think Jon is describing a scenario where the dialog has a default button or action. In this design, the default button reacts to the "enter" keystroke, regardless of where focus is. Note that the default button is rendered in a way that makes it clear that it is the default*. If the default action is somehow dangerous, then there should be a followup dialog along the lines of: "are you sure you want to X?" allowing the user to cancel the default action, and return to the original dialog. * - I'm not sure that all GUI toolkits do a good job communicating the default button to the accessibility API. -- ;;;;joseph. 'Die Wahrheit ist Irgendwo da Draußen. Wieder.' - C. Carter -
Received on Friday, 27 January 2017 16:16:57 UTC