- From: Schnabel, Stefan <stefan.schnabel@sap.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 12:42:09 +0000
- To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- CC: "public-aria@w3.org" <public-aria@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <34f8bf3a2f2f4d8cb0214922b2f5e01b@sap.com>
Hi Steve, On reading http://w3c.github.io/aria/accname-aam/accname-aam.html#dfn-hidden I had the impression that aria-hidden falls NOT in this realm since you can also flag visible text with aria-hidden=true violating the ALL users precondition for that definition. So are we back at square one with my question? Or should the definition changed for it covers also aria-hidden? Regards Stefan From: Schnabel, Stefan [mailto:stefan.schnabel@sap.com] Sent: Donnerstag, 13. April 2017 14:25 To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> Cc: public-aria@w3.org Subject: RE: aria-labelledby pointing to an element with aria-hidden=”true” Thanks! This was exactly I was looking for. It’s not in the ARIA spec but the mapping guide… >> that and include *hidden text* as .. A even sharper one would be clarifying additionally by which means hidden text was hidden (there quite a few, aria-hidden is just one of them). If this reads >> that and include *text hidden with any known method (aria-hidden, CSS, display=none etc* as .. we are fine. - Stefan From: Steve Faulkner [mailto:faulkner.steve@gmail.com] Sent: Donnerstag, 13. April 2017 13:59 To: Schnabel, Stefan <stefan.schnabel@sap.com<mailto:stefan.schnabel@sap.com>> Cc: public-aria@w3.org<mailto:public-aria@w3.org> Subject: Re: aria-labelledby pointing to an element with aria-hidden=”true” refer to Accessible Name and Description: Computation and API Mappings 1.1 http://w3c.github.io/aria/accname-aam/accname-aam.html#step2 Comment: By default, assistive technologies<http://w3c.github.io/aria/accname-aam/accname-aam.html#dfn-assistive-technologies> do not relay hidden information, but an author can explicitly override that and include hidden text as part of the accessible name<http://w3c.github.io/aria/accname-aam/accname-aam.html#dfn-accessible-name> or accessible description<http://w3c.github.io/aria/accname-aam/accname-aam.html#dfn-accessible-description> by using aria-labelledby or aria-describedby. -- Regards SteveF Current Standards Work @W3C<http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2015/03/current-standards-work-at-w3c/> On 13 April 2017 at 12:49, Schnabel, Stefan <stefan.schnabel@sap.com<mailto:stefan.schnabel@sap.com>> wrote: I have a question to the group regarding aria-labelledby pointing to an element with aria-hidden=”true”. Is that an allowed relation according to http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/ ? Also, http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria-1.1/#aria-hidden and http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria-1.1/#aria-labelledby give no clue about this so it seems to be OK. I do not speak of better alternatives for respective use cases, just if the specification explicitely leaves that as a possible option. Screen readers (Jaws) currently read information in nodes with aria-hidden=”true” associated with aria-labelledby when respective elements with that relation are focused. Best Regards Stefan
Received on Thursday, 13 April 2017 12:42:44 UTC