W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-aria@w3.org > March 2016

Re: Alternative APG landmarks draft

From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 22:07:03 +0000
Message-ID: <CA+ri+VmvZeRfUELVnpXJpGg_4BnS1O17Dai1+zp5cxYswd+RRA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Matt King <a11ythinker@gmail.com>
Cc: LĂ©onie Watson <tink@tink.uk>, Michiel Bijl <michiel@agosto.nl>, ARIA Working Group <public-aria@w3.org>
On 6 March 2016 at 21:30, Matt King <a11ythinker@gmail.com> wrote:

> >There should be no requirement for the <section> element to have an
> accessible name.


There is no requirement, but there is an implicit requirement that AT only
expose section elements with accessible names to users.

--

Regards

SteveF
Current Standards Work @W3C
<http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2015/03/current-standards-work-at-w3c/>
Received on Sunday, 6 March 2016 22:08:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:58:22 UTC