Re: Alternative APG landmarks draft

On 6 March 2016 at 21:30, Matt King <> wrote:

> >There should be no requirement for the <section> element to have an
> accessible name.

There is no requirement, but there is an implicit requirement that AT only
expose section elements with accessible names to users.



Current Standards Work @W3C

Received on Sunday, 6 March 2016 22:08:11 UTC