- From: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 13:20:40 -0400
- To: ARIA <public-aria@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2016 17:20:34 UTC
In my previous message <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria/2016Jun/0177.html> I tried to separate out the risks people were concerned about with the password role, that I think are not caused by the role itself. Here I want to identify the risks that *are* created by the role, so we can weigh those since they're the ones I argue are the only ones we should be considering for the role. So far, two concerns specific to the role stick out in my memory: * The presence of the role makes it easier for bots to discover custom password fields and exploit such unsecured fields. * The availability of the role may encourage authors to use custom password fields with the risks those bring. Are there others I missed? That are caused by the password role itself, not by custom password fields in general. Michael
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2016 17:20:34 UTC