- From: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:29:35 -0400
- To: Bryan Garaventa <bryan.garaventa@ssbbartgroup.com>, Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com>
- Cc: 'ARIA' <public-aria@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <b2882933-1ffa-fcc7-67a1-594024700bdb@w3.org>
This is a technical question, not a process question, so please respond on the main discussion list, not the admin list. Michael On 10/06/2016 2:19 PM, Bryan Garaventa wrote: > What appears to me to be at the heart of this issue, is the question "what is meant by an interactive widget that is not composite?" > > So for the record, can somebody here please define what is meant by a widget that is not a composite widget? > > This is very important, because it looks like the primary opposition here is the assumption that they should do the opposite of what the spec actually says they do. > > > Bryan Garaventa > Accessibility Fellow > SSB BART Group, Inc. > bryan.garaventa@ssbbartgroup.com > 415.624.2709 (o) > www.SSBBartGroup.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joanmarie Diggs [mailto:jdiggs@igalia.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 7:06 PM > To: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org> > Cc: ARIA Admin <public-aria-admin@w3.org> > Subject: Re: 7-day CfC: notes on option, treeitem, and spinbutton about children presentational - closes 15 June > > Explicit +1 for wider review of this topic. > --joanie > > On 06/09/2016 09:04 PM, Michael Cooper wrote: >> This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to the Accessible Rich Internet >> Applications (ARIA) Working Group regarding the following resolution >> of the ARIA Working group: >> >> Add editorial note to option, treeitem, and spinbutton roles that >> their "children are presentational" status is provisional >> >> >> Background >> >> This was approved by the participants of the 9 June 2016 >> teleconference, and further context is available in the minutes: >> >> https://www.w3.org/2016/06/09-aria-minutes.html#item02 >> >> Note this resolution does not close discussion on the issue of whether >> these roles ultimately should have the children presentational >> restriction, or whether further engineering is needed, and if so in >> what time frame. This edit supports wider review of the topic. >> >> >> Action >> >> This CfC is now open for objection, comment, as well as statements of >> support via email. Silence will be interpreted as support, though >> messages of support are certainly welcome. >> >> If you object to this proposal, or have comments concerning it, please >> respond by replying on list to this message no later than 23:59 >> (midnight) Boston Time, Wednesday, 15 June 2016. For objections only, >> please copy the main aria@w3.org list to allow technical discussion of >> the objection to happen there. >> >> >> Process >> >> This CfC is conducted per the ARIA WG decision policy: >> >> https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/decision-policy >> >> I am issuing this CfC as acting chair, but Rich will record the formal >> ratification if passed. >> >> Michael >> >
Received on Friday, 10 June 2016 18:29:41 UTC