- From: White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 16:11:12 +0000
- To: Bryan Garaventa <bryan.garaventa@ssbbartgroup.com>, "tink@tink.uk" <tink@tink.uk>, "Schnabel, Stefan" <stefan.schnabel@sap.com>, "Richard Schwerdtfeger" <richschwer@gmail.com>
- CC: Matt King <a11ythinker@gmail.com>, ARIA Working Group <public-aria@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Bryan Garaventa [mailto:bryan.garaventa@ssbbartgroup.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 11:40 AM > I have to agree, that's going to be misused everywhere. [Jason] I don't think concerns about potential for misuse should be treated as a reason for depriving well informed application and document authors of the features and flexibility that they need in order to enhance the accessibility of their work. Claims about potential for misuse could be made against other, well established features of ARIA, for example aria-label or aria-describedby. Let's confine this discussion to any fine tuning that may be necessary in the specification to ensure consistency of implementation, and take up concerns about potential misuse in the guidance offered to authors, where such issues should legitimately be addressed. ________________________________ This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited. Thank you for your compliance. ________________________________
Received on Thursday, 7 July 2016 16:11:43 UTC