RE: Significant ambiguities in aria-roledescription

From: Richard Schwerdtfeger [mailto:richschwer@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 9:11 AM

Matt,

While I understand your point, the group’s job is not to design the screen readers for them.
[Jason] Although it could be argued that Matt’s second point is overly prescriptive of screen reader behavior, his first point concerns what user agents disclose to the accessibility API where role=none and aria-roledescription is non-empty. I think the role value is (or ought to be) controlling in this situation. My quick review didn’t identify a statement in the draft that would address the point, but I haven’t conducted a thorough review outside the section on aria-roledescription and the section on role=none. I’m content to leave the text as is if we think it’s sufficiently clear as it stands, but neither would I object to the addition of an explanatory statement.

________________________________

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.


Thank you for your compliance.

________________________________