W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-aria@w3.org > February 2016

Fwd: aria-ACTION-2031: Address SVG in addition to HTML in the ARIA abstract and introduction

From: Richard Schwerdtfeger <richschwer@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:06:51 -0600
To: ARIA Working Group <public-aria@w3.org>
Message-Id: <C50FCC25-2156-483E-918D-F12515B5671E@gmail.com>
Forgot to post this to the list. 

> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: Richard Schwerdtfeger <richschwer@gmail.com>
> Subject: aria-ACTION-2031: Address SVG in addition to HTML in the ARIA abstract and introduction
> Date: February 23, 2016 at 6:01:02 PM CST
> To: Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com>, Mike Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
> 
> I am going through outstanding issues and creating actions for myself to address them. This particular one is intended to address support for SVG in addition to HTMl in the Abstract and Introduction. 
> 
> I ended up making a LOT of edits as many of the links referred to the old mapping specifications. 
> 
> https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/action2031/aria/aria.html
> 
> So, I have a few questions:
> 
> 1. Should we references the HTML AAM and SVG2 AAM as part of the suite of documents? I have not done so. 
> 2. Should we reference the graphics and dpub modules as well as their mapping specs. ?
> 3. We have a leftover reference to UAAG 1.0 and we are at 2.0 which is a note. Should we just remove the reference to it altogether. I think we should.
> 
> Please take a look and give me your feedback on these questions. 
> 
> Rich Schwerdtfeger


Received on Wednesday, 24 February 2016 00:07:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:23:20 UTC