- From: Richard Schwerdtfeger <richschwer@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 08:28:49 -0500
- To: "jason@accessibleculture.org" <jason@accessibleculture.org>
- Cc: Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com>, Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com>, Accessible Rich Internet Applications Working Group <public-aria@w3.org>, "wai-xtech@w3.org" <wai-xtech@w3.org>
We will not be doing MSAA+UIA Express in ARIA 1.1. The group already agreed to this. Microsoft has stated that this platform is not strategic to them and they are abandoning it. Also, Chrome, uses MSAA+IA2 and which has 50% market share is not using it. This would create an unnecessary time delay for ARIA 1.1. The group is evaluating doing an ARIA 1.2 - If there is willingness to do this by the group at that time then that is fine. Do not make this an ARIA 1.1 issue. Rich > On Aug 16, 2016, at 9:07 PM, jason@accessibleculture.org wrote: > > Let’s please move this discussion to https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/404. > > I proceed with moving the role info from the MSAA+UIAExpress column to the the MSAA+IA2 column. I’ve created the “html-remove-uiaexpress” branch in GH to do this. > > Jason > > >> On 16/08/2016, at 9:43 AM, Jason Kiss <jason@accessibleculture.org> wrote: >> >> Ok. So, to confirm, we can delete the MSAA + UIA Express column, and move the MSAA role to the MSAA + IA2 column, so that for something like the <abbr> element, we'd have the following: >> >> MSAA Role: ROLE_SYSTEM_TEXT >> IA2 Role: IA2_ROLE_TEXT_FRAME >> Object attributes: "abbr" attribute on the containing td if a single child, text content used as a value >> Interfaces: IAccessibleText2; IAccessibleHypertext2; >> Or is it clear enough from the role names which API they belong to such that we could include them together? For example, >> >> Roles: ROLE_SYSTEM_TEXT; IA2_ROLE_TEXT_FRAME >> >> Any preference? >> >> Jason >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 5:13 AM, Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com> wrote: >>> You know, we can move MSAA roles to MSAA + IA2 column instead, then UIA >>> patterns will be matched by UIA column. Do we have anything left? >>> Thanks. >>> Alexander. >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:22 PM, Jason Kiss <jason@accessibleculture.org> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I also prefer the idea of adding notes to the UIA column. >>>> >>>> Alex, wrt the HTML-AAM, can you give me an impression of what from the >>>> existing MSAA + UIA Express column needs to be added as a note to the UIA >>>> column, for which elements and properties? Once that’s done, we can get rid >>>> of the MSAA + UIA Express column. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Jason >>>> >>>> >>>> On 11/08/2016, at 7:43 AM, Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, Cynthia. Sorry for my late reply. If you're still looking for my >>>> input, then notes in UIA column should work well. >>>> Alex. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Alex, >>>>> >>>>> I recall you saying in another context that Firefox was interested in UIA >>>>> Express. The column for it was removed from Core-AAM, and is pretty sparse >>>>> in HTML-AAM. We need to figure out how best to document it. Most of the >>>>> mappings will be the same as the UIA mappings. What do you think is the best >>>>> way to document the places where it's different? We could add notes to the >>>>> UIA column where needed, or have a separate column where we copy the UIA >>>>> column and add the notes. I think I'd prefer to have a single column if we >>>>> can, because it will be easier to maintain in the spec. Do you think that >>>>> would work for you? We're not doing any more development on the >>>>> implementation in IE, so you're the main customer right now. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Cynthia >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Accessible Rich Internet Applications Working Group Issue Tracker >>>>> [mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org] >>>>> Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 9:20 AM >>>>> To: public-aria@w3.org >>>>> Subject: aria-ISSUE-1015 (uia-express): Firefox interested in doing >>>>> UIA-Express. We may need to un-deprecate it. [ARIA 1.1 Core Mapping >>>>> Specification] >>>>> >>>>> aria-ISSUE-1015 (uia-express): Firefox interested in doing UIA-Express. >>>>> We may need to un-deprecate it. [ARIA 1.1 Core Mapping Specification] >>>>> >>>>> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/issues/1015 >>>>> >>>>> Raised by: Cynthia Shelly >>>>> On product: ARIA 1.1 Core Mapping Specification >>>>> >>>>> Firefox has expressed interest in doing UIA Express. We may need to >>>>> un-deprecate it. If we do that, I propose we start by copying the UIA >>>>> column, and then making notes where there is a difference. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > > > Jason Kiss > jason@accessibleculture.org > http://www.accessibleculture.org > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 17 August 2016 13:29:33 UTC