Re: Web Platform charter under development

It might make sense for the HTML AAM work to be done alongside the other 
AAM work within the ARIA WG. Of the three current editors only one 
(Steve) is a member of WP, whereas they are all members of the ARIA WG I 
believe.

Léonie.



-- 
@LeonieWatson tink.uk Carpe diem

On 10/08/2016 21:20, Rich Schwerdtfeger wrote:
> This is asking whether the entire HTML AAM effort should go to the ARIA
> WG. I doubt we have resources to do that unless the same people continue
> to work on it.
>
> Rich
>
> Rich Schwerdtfeger
>
>
>
>
>> On Aug 10, 2016, at 3:12 PM, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org
>> <mailto:cooper@w3.org>> wrote:
>>
>> The Web Platform group is working on a new charter:
>>
>> http://w3c.github.io/charter-html/group-charter.html
>>
>> I asked if was ok for APA and ARIA to review and Philippe said yes.
>>
>> I think APA should review from a view of deliverables and whether we
>> need to / are able to work on accessibility review of them. But note
>> that at a charter level there might not be anything specific to say
>> unless there's a major flag. The important thing is that we can review
>> the stuff in the ordinary course of business, which the charter
>> already sets up provisions for.
>>
>> I think ARIA should look at the HTML Accessibility API Mappings, and
>> in particular take a position on whether that should continue to be a
>> joint deliverable between Web Platform and ARIA, or just become a sole
>> deliverable of ARIA. It should also look at whether the necessary
>> deliverables and coordinations are expressed to ensure ARIA works in
>> HTML. There may be other deliverables that relate to ARIA work as well.
>>
>> Philippe asks that comments be filed via GitHub:
>>
>> https://github.com/w3c/charter-html/issues/
>>
>> But it might be best if I aggregate any WG feedback rather than get a
>> bunch of people filing issues. I'm not sure there will be feedback,
>> but thought it was important that these groups have the opportunity to
>> review.
>>
>> Michael
>>
>>
>

Received on Thursday, 11 August 2016 08:56:43 UTC