- From: Rich Schwerdtfeger <richschwer@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 15:23:42 -0500
- To: ARIA <public-aria@w3.org>, Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, Jason Kiss <jason@accessibleculture.org>
- Message-Id: <E2F23776-7FAE-49EB-9BB3-D7E393489411@gmail.com>
Please take a look at the new Web Platform Charter. They are considering possibly moving the HTML AAM effort to the ARIA WG. This is a lot of additional work. Steve, Jason, Alex, would you go with that work to develop it in ARIA? Cheers, Rich Rich Schwerdtfeger > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org> > Subject: Web Platform charter under development > Date: August 10, 2016 at 3:12:22 PM CDT > To: Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group <public-apa@w3.org>, ARIA <public-aria@w3.org> > Resent-From: public-apa@w3.org > > The Web Platform group is working on a new charter: > > http://w3c.github.io/charter-html/group-charter.html > > I asked if was ok for APA and ARIA to review and Philippe said yes. > > I think APA should review from a view of deliverables and whether we need to / are able to work on accessibility review of them. But note that at a charter level there might not be anything specific to say unless there's a major flag. The important thing is that we can review the stuff in the ordinary course of business, which the charter already sets up provisions for. > > I think ARIA should look at the HTML Accessibility API Mappings, and in particular take a position on whether that should continue to be a joint deliverable between Web Platform and ARIA, or just become a sole deliverable of ARIA. It should also look at whether the necessary deliverables and coordinations are expressed to ensure ARIA works in HTML. There may be other deliverables that relate to ARIA work as well. > > Philippe asks that comments be filed via GitHub: > > https://github.com/w3c/charter-html/issues/ > > But it might be best if I aggregate any WG feedback rather than get a bunch of people filing issues. I'm not sure there will be feedback, but thought it was important that these groups have the opportunity to review. > > Michael > >
Received on Wednesday, 10 August 2016 20:24:12 UTC