- From: Matt King <a11ythinker@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 18:12:07 -0700
- To: "'Schnabel, Stefan'" <stefan.schnabel@sap.com>, "'ARIA Working Group'" <public-aria@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <03e601d1f048$b7b4b540$271e1fc0$@Gmail.com>
Stefan, Why would a screen reader user want to know if the author was thinking of a particular grid as either a data grid or a layout grid? From the user's perspective, a grid is a grid is a grid, and you just start pressing arrow keys to see how it works. Basic grid navigation is a very simple concept. The purpose of making a distinction between data grids and layout grids for authors is to help them design an interaction that is appropriate for the content. If the interaction is appropriate, the user will understand the experience without ever being aware of such distinctions. >From a screen reader developer perspective, the behaviors should always be the same regardless of the purpose of the grid. This is part of the beauty, simplicity, and power of the grid role. Since a grid is a widget, screen readers should always reveal the semantics regardless of how many rows or columns it contains and regardless of whether it has headers or not. If a screen reader does not reveal the semantics, it is not respecting the intention of the role. Matt From: Schnabel, Stefan [mailto:stefan.schnabel@sap.com] Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 4:48 AM To: Matt King <a11ythinker@gmail.com>; ARIA Working Group <public-aria@w3.org> Subject: RE: APG grid pattern text ready for review Matt, Besides from commenting in [2], I miss two very central points in the grid pattern text: ==> Distinguishing between layout and data grid in code by explicit attribute declaration. Omitting header cells is not distinctive enough. What should screen readers use as information to distinguish between the cases? Should they guess? ==> One-column layout grids: LISTS. They are frequent. Shouldn't there be a explicit indication for this a screen reader can use NOT to say "Grid" but "List" instead? Best Regards Stefan From: Matt King [mailto:a11ythinker@gmail.com] Sent: Montag, 18. Juli 2016 03:07 To: ARIA Working Group <public-aria@w3.org <mailto:public-aria@w3.org> > Subject: APG grid pattern text ready for review The documentation (not yet the code examples) for the ARIA 1.1 grid design pattern is ready for review[1]. Please provide feedback and comments in ARIA practices issue #29: https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/issues/29 For reference, this new grid design pattern section replaces ARIA 1.0 design pattern sections for both "Grid" [3] and "Actionable, Sortable Column Header in a Grid" [4]. Matt King References: [1] ARIA 1.1 Grid Pattern http://w3c.github.io/aria-practices/#grid [2] APG 1.1 Issue #29 for grid pattern feedback: https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/issues/29 [3] ARIA 1.0 design pattern text for Grid: http://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-wai-aria-practices-1.1-20160317/#grid [4] ARIA 1.0 design pattern text for Actionable, Sortable Column Header in a Grid: http://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-wai-aria-practices-1.1-20160317/#sortablegrid
Received on Sunday, 7 August 2016 01:17:55 UTC