Re: Apparent conflict between ARIA 1.1 documents.

Joe,
The editors draft you are reviewing is the version before we split the repositories. Can you please look at http://w3c.github.io/aria-practices/#grid and see if the issue is still present there. 
The grid section in particular is in the middle of an extensive rewrite. At a glance I think that this issue is resolved in the latest version. 
Regards,
James

Michiel - is there any way we can redirect the editors draft in the old repository to the new one?



> On Jul 28, 2016, at 05:14, Joe Stephen <JStephen@vfo-group.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear committee,
>  
> Section 2.13 in the document "WAI ARIA Authoring Practices 1.1" at http://w3c.github.io/aria/practices/aria-practices.html,
> the third note on setting role on TR to ROW seems to contradict section "3. Document conformance requirements for use of ARIA attributes in HTML" in the document "ARIA in HTML" at http://www.w3.org/TR/html-aria/.
>  
> "Each row should be clearly marked using a <TR> from HTML and by using a role of
> row"
> and "Whenever a row is selected, set its role to
> Row and its aria-selected="true".
>  
> The ARIA in HTML section 3 states that a TR should not have a role of ROW, or, more generally, that an HTML element with native semantics should not be given a role with the same semantics.
> Please clarify or fix instances of such contradictions between the documents.
>  
> Joseph Stephen
> VFO | Software Developer
> 11800 31st Court North, St. Petersburg, FL 33716
> T +61 416090232
> jstephen@vfo-group.com
> www.vfo-group.com
>  
> <image001.png>
> The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential.  Therefore, if this message has been received in error, please delete it without reading it.  Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive any applicable privilege..  Please do not disseminate this message without the permission of the author.
> 
>  
> 
>