If there is consensus on the main ARIA working group to go with the longer name, I don't have a problem with that. In the SVG Accessibility Task Force, we did discuss a number of variations on the name and settled on graphics-doc as a compromise between concise and comprehensible. I would ask for a quick resolution, though (i.e., comments on mailing list this week & discussion at the next ARIA telcon), so we can update all the specs sooner rather than later, and definitely before the next heartbeat drafts. ~Amelia On 28 April 2016 at 19:14, James Craig <jcraig@apple.com> wrote: > While reviewing a related thread, I noticed the "graphics-doc" role should > be "graphics-document"... With the unfortunate exception of the "img" role > (I admit missing this), ARIA has avoided inconsistent abbreviation. > > http://www.w3.org/TR/graphics-aria-1.0/#graphics-doc > > > >
Received on Friday, 29 April 2016 02:34:56 UTC