Re: Password role proposal: Freedom Scientific response

John Foliot writes:
> White, Jason J wrote:
> > 
> > I'm not proposing a change to the exit criteria, but I am expressing concern
> > about the idea that a feature could be considered to have interoperable
> > implementations where there are no demonstrable consumers on the AT side. In
> > practice, I doubt that this will be a problem in ARIA 1.1, as there are several
> > screen reader development organizations represented in the group (Apple,
> > Google, Igalia, Microsoft, Nv Access, and possibly others that I've missed -
> > apologies if so).
> 
> ...although, as of today, I am only aware of Igalia publicly expressing support and intention-to-implement for this in a functionally useful way
> 
And, have you ever Seen Apple, or Microsoft, or Freedom pre-announce
features? They're closed code shops, and they're not going to tell you
-- never have -- what they're going to do tomorrow or later on this
afternoon.


There's a correct horse and cart order here, let's not forget.

Janina

> JF
> 

-- 

Janina Sajka,	Phone:	+1.443.300.2200
			sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net
		Email:	janina@rednote.net

Linux Foundation Fellow
Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup:	http://a11y.org

The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures	http://www.w3.org/wai/apa

Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2016 16:05:27 UTC