RE: Password role proposal: Freedom Scientific response from Léonie Watson on 2016-04-25 (public-aria@w3.org from April 2016)

From: Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 17:46:44 +0100
To: "'Rich Schwerdtfeger'" <richschwer@gmail.com>
Cc: "'John Foliot'" <john.foliot@deque.com>, "'Birkir Gunnarsson'" <birkir.gunnarsson@deque.com>, <public-aria@w3.org>
Message-ID: <02d701d19f12$12b56300$38202900$@tink.uk>

From: Rich Schwerdtfeger [mailto:richschwer@gmail.com] 
Sent: 25 April 2016 17:29
“I agree with you that the AT vendors need to do what you suggest. … However, we need to walk before we can run.”

 

We do, yes. In this case I think walking means we need to drop the password role from 1.1, and take more time to try and get buy in from implementors.

 

Léonie.

Received on Monday, 25 April 2016 16:47:27 UTC