- From: Rich Schwerdtfeger <richschwer@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 14:41:03 -0500
- To: Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com>
- Cc: James Teh <jamie@nvaccess.org>, IA2 List <Accessibility-ia2@lists.linux-foundation.org>, ARIA Working Group <public-aria@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <6126D801-D742-4600-95D3-9AD3F99182FE@gmail.com>
+1 That is clean. Rich Rich Schwerdtfeger > On Apr 11, 2016, at 1:22 PM, Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com> wrote: > > Hey again. > > New proposal for the types: > > ERROR_MESSAGE: Would go on the input which is invalid and point to the > element with the statement of what is wrong. > > ERROR_SOURCE: Would go on the element which contains the statement of > what is wrong and point to the input which is invalid. > > --joanie > > On 04/11/2016 01:26 PM, Joanmarie Diggs wrote: >> Hey Jamie, all. >> >> I don't believe we have a conclusion on this. So resuming the conversation. >> >> If there's sufficient belief that errormessage is inherently different >> and that new API is called for, what about a new relation type? >> Personally, I am not jazzed by yet another relation type. But it is easy >> enough to add. We could add ERROR_FOR (or ERROR_MESSAGE_FOR) and ... >> what would the reciprocal relation be called? >> >> --joanie >> >> On 03/01/2016 06:33 PM, James Teh wrote: >> >>> Everyone else is saying that errormessage is inherently different to >>> description. If that really is how it's meant to be according to the >>> ARIA spec (I disagree, but that's not relevant here), then mapping it to >>> description (even with an attribute) is a big hack. You can't have it >>> both ways; it's either just a specialisation of description or it's not. >>> Several people now say it's not the former, so it must be the latter. >>> And if it *is* the former, then it should be included as part of the >>> description text as well. >>> >>> FWIW, I don't like this whle thing at all, but it seems wrong to me that >>> the ARIA spec says it's not at all a description and the a11y specs say >>> it is. Personally, I think the ARIA spec *should* treat it as just an >>> extension of description, but I've already made that point and it >>> doesn't seem popular. >>> >>> Jamie >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Accessibility-ia2 mailing list >> Accessibility-ia2@lists.linuxfoundation.org >> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2 >> > >
Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2016 19:41:32 UTC