- From: Bryan Garaventa <bryan.garaventa@ssbbartgroup.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 16:16:10 +0000
- To: Joseph Scheuhammer <clown@alum.mit.edu>, Rich Schwerdtfeger <schwer@yahoo.com>, ARIA <public-aria@w3.org>
Hi, This still does not account for when role="combobox" is placed on an input+type="text" and uses aria-activedescendant on the same element to reference role="option" within a listbox elsewhere in the DOM. -----Original Message----- From: Joseph Scheuhammer [mailto:clown@alum.mit.edu] Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 9:01 AM To: Rich Schwerdtfeger <schwer@yahoo.com>; ARIA <public-aria@w3.org> Subject: Re: Agenda: April 7, 2016 WAI-ARIA Working Group Rich, On 2016-04-05 1:03 PM, Rich Schwerdtfeger wrote: > 3. Action 1490 and 1743: Combobox and aria-activedescendant on > application (25 minutes *max* discussion) Matt I had an action to modify the definition for aria-activedescendant in light of the changes to combobox. The changes were made in this branch: http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/mck-action1490-activedescendant/aria/aria.html#aria-activedescendant I added a paragraph to the end of the definition: " A special use case is a combobox where its textbox has DOM focus, and that textbox employs an aria-activedescendant attribute to reference the currently active listbox option. The referenced listbox option is not in fact a descendant of the textbox itself, but of its parent combobox element. Even so, the aria-activedescendant property is treated by user agents as the active descendant of the combobox, and not the textbox. " -- ;;;;joseph. 'Die Wahrheit ist Irgendwo da Draußen. Wieder.' - C. Carter -
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2016 16:16:41 UTC