I agree we should change this. From: Steve Faulkner [mailto:faulkner.steve@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 9:39 AM To: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com> Cc: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>; public-aria@w3.org; PF <public-pfwg@w3.org> Subject: Re: article navigation On 3 December 2015 at 17:30, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com<mailto:schwer@us.ibm.com>> wrote: Yes, and as we have told them it is a very bad design to use articles as landmarks as there can be many of them. related gripe, currently article maps to document role in some APIs [1], but it is often simply not a document http://www.w3.org/TR/core-aam-1.1/#role-map-article -- Regards SteveF Current Standards Work @W3C<http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2015/03/current-standards-work-at-w3c/>
Received on Friday, 4 December 2015 00:01:46 UTC