Re: Preview link to a draft warning for poorly supported widgets

The warning styling comes from respec. The CSS specs are bikeshed so I wouldn’t expect them to be the same.

https://github.com/w3c/respec/blob/092e9788b58c342da35378ec29ef26fbb002b4c7/assets/issues-notes.css


James Nurthen  |  Accessibility Engineer  |  Adobe  |  p. 415.832.2734  |  c. 415.987.1918  |  nurthen@adobe.com



From: "McCarthy, Mark C" <mcmccar2@uillinois.edu>
Date: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 at 12:20 PM
To: Zoë Bijl <w3c@moiety.me>, "public-aria-practices@w3.org" <public-aria-practices@w3.org>
Subject: RE: Preview link to a draft warning for poorly supported widgets
Resent-From: <public-aria-practices@w3.org>
Resent-Date: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 at 12:20 PM

If you want to look into it Zoë, I won’t stop you! I’m not sure where to look for what you’re mentioning. :) I agree, the CSS for it could stand a little bit of sprucing, particularly on the mobile view.

In any case, draft PR 1186<https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/pull/1186> is ready for review and comments. Thanks for the input today everyone!

From: Zoë Bijl <w3c@moiety.me>
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 11:29 AM
To: public-aria-practices@w3.org
Subject: Re: Preview link to a draft warning for poorly supported widgets

Interesting. Because the styling is little bit funky. As others have already said I think the text is good tho! Any chance you could look if something like the CSS spec has a similar warning? I can also look into that if you prefer.

—Zoë Bijl


On Tue, 24 Sep 2019, at 18:14, McCarthy, Mark C wrote:

Thanks Matt!



Zoë, I believe it is. There’s other warnings under Naming Techniques<https://raw.githack.com/w3c/aria-practices/issue1150-provide-warning-for-support-gaps/aria-practices.html#naming_techniques> that look the same. This is just using the `warning` class that is included.


From: Matt King <a11ythinker@gmail.com<mailto:a11ythinker@gmail.com>>
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 9:25 AM
To: 'Zoë Bijl' <w3c@moiety.me<mailto:w3c@moiety.me>>; public-aria-practices@w3.org<mailto:public-aria-practices@w3.org>
Subject: RE: Preview link to a draft warning for poorly supported widgets



Added to today’s agenda.


From: Zoë Bijl <w3c@moiety.me<mailto:w3c@moiety.me>>
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 4:37 AM
To: public-aria-practices@w3.org<mailto:public-aria-practices@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Preview link to a draft warning for poorly supported widgets



Is this the W3C’s default warning message style? If not. Is there one?



—Zoë Bijl





On Mon, 23 Sep 2019, at 23:29, Scott O'Hara wrote:

I like the warning text so far.  I think if it also appeared on the Example pages that would, IMO, be a good way to solve for issue #8 as well.



From: "McCarthy, Mark C" <mcmccar2@uillinois.edu<mailto:mcmccar2@uillinois.edu>>
Date: Monday, September 23, 2019 at 5:23 PM
To: "public-aria-practices@w3.org<mailto:public-aria-practices@w3.org>" <public-aria-practices@w3.org<mailto:public-aria-practices@w3.org>>
Subject: Preview link to a draft warning for poorly supported widgets
Resent-From: <public-aria-practices@w3.org<mailto:public-aria-practices@w3.org>>
Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 21:23:07 +0000



Hi all,



Following discussion of issue #1150<https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/issues/1150>, I’ve come up with a draft warning<https://raw.githack.com/w3c/aria-practices/issue1150-provide-warning-for-support-gaps/aria-practices.html#slider>. I think I’m on target, but may need refreshing.



Happy to make tweaks as necessary, and perhaps if time allows, we can discuss during tomorrow’s call.

___

Mark McCarthy, MSIM, IADP

Pronoun: He or They<https://www.gsafewi.org/wp-content/uploads/Pronouns-are-Important.pdf>

QA, Accessibility Engineer | AITS IT Accessibility Liaison

Administrative Information Technology Services

217-300-3408<mailto:217-300-3408> | mcmccar2@illinois.edu<mailto:mcmccar2@illinois.edu>

“Knowing is not enough, we must apply. Willing is not enough, we must do.” - Bruce Lee



[University of Illinois Logo]<http://illinois.edu/>

Under the Illinois Freedom of Information Act any written communication to or from university employees regarding university business is a public record and may be subject to public disclosure.





Attachments:

  *   image001.png



Attachments:

  *   image001.png