- From: McCarthy, Mark C <mcmccar2@uillinois.edu>
- Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 19:19:34 +0000
- To: Zoë Bijl <w3c@moiety.me>, "public-aria-practices@w3.org" <public-aria-practices@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <BY5PR11MB4307B2772DCDA0D8CE92147A8C840@BY5PR11MB4307.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
If you want to look into it Zoë, I won’t stop you! I’m not sure where to look for what you’re mentioning. :) I agree, the CSS for it could stand a little bit of sprucing, particularly on the mobile view. In any case, draft PR 1186<https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/pull/1186> is ready for review and comments. Thanks for the input today everyone! From: Zoë Bijl <w3c@moiety.me> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 11:29 AM To: public-aria-practices@w3.org Subject: Re: Preview link to a draft warning for poorly supported widgets Interesting. Because the styling is little bit funky. As others have already said I think the text is good tho! Any chance you could look if something like the CSS spec has a similar warning? I can also look into that if you prefer. —Zoë Bijl On Tue, 24 Sep 2019, at 18:14, McCarthy, Mark C wrote: Thanks Matt! Zoë, I believe it is. There’s other warnings under Naming Techniques<https://raw.githack.com/w3c/aria-practices/issue1150-provide-warning-for-support-gaps/aria-practices.html#naming_techniques> that look the same. This is just using the `warning` class that is included. From: Matt King <a11ythinker@gmail.com<mailto:a11ythinker@gmail.com>> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 9:25 AM To: 'Zoë Bijl' <w3c@moiety.me<mailto:w3c@moiety.me>>; public-aria-practices@w3.org<mailto:public-aria-practices@w3.org> Subject: RE: Preview link to a draft warning for poorly supported widgets Added to today’s agenda. From: Zoë Bijl <w3c@moiety.me<mailto:w3c@moiety.me>> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 4:37 AM To: public-aria-practices@w3.org<mailto:public-aria-practices@w3.org> Subject: Re: Preview link to a draft warning for poorly supported widgets Is this the W3C’s default warning message style? If not. Is there one? —Zoë Bijl On Mon, 23 Sep 2019, at 23:29, Scott O'Hara wrote: I like the warning text so far. I think if it also appeared on the Example pages that would, IMO, be a good way to solve for issue #8 as well. From: "McCarthy, Mark C" <mcmccar2@uillinois.edu<mailto:mcmccar2@uillinois.edu>> Date: Monday, September 23, 2019 at 5:23 PM To: "public-aria-practices@w3.org<mailto:public-aria-practices@w3.org>" <public-aria-practices@w3.org<mailto:public-aria-practices@w3.org>> Subject: Preview link to a draft warning for poorly supported widgets Resent-From: <public-aria-practices@w3.org<mailto:public-aria-practices@w3.org>> Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 21:23:07 +0000 Hi all, Following discussion of issue #1150<https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/issues/1150>, I’ve come up with a draft warning<https://raw.githack.com/w3c/aria-practices/issue1150-provide-warning-for-support-gaps/aria-practices.html#slider>. I think I’m on target, but may need refreshing. Happy to make tweaks as necessary, and perhaps if time allows, we can discuss during tomorrow’s call. ___ Mark McCarthy, MSIM, IADP Pronoun: He or They<https://www.gsafewi.org/wp-content/uploads/Pronouns-are-Important.pdf> QA, Accessibility Engineer | AITS IT Accessibility Liaison Administrative Information Technology Services 217-300-3408<mailto:217-300-3408> | mcmccar2@illinois.edu<mailto:mcmccar2@illinois.edu> “Knowing is not enough, we must apply. Willing is not enough, we must do.” - Bruce Lee [University of Illinois Logo]<http://illinois.edu/> Under the Illinois Freedom of Information Act any written communication to or from university employees regarding university business is a public record and may be subject to public disclosure. Attachments: * image001.png Attachments: * image001.png
Attachments
- image/png attachment: image001.png
Received on Tuesday, 24 September 2019 19:20:04 UTC