- From: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 16:05:02 -0400
- To: Amelia Bellamy-Royds <amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Liam R. E. Quin" <liam@w3.org>, ARIA Editors <public-aria-editors@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <17b36165-2c4c-7ca3-1458-f05aead4d841@w3.org>
On 13/04/2018 5:44 PM, Michael Cooper wrote: > On 12/04/2018 11:02 PM, Amelia Bellamy-Royds wrote: >> >> >> First, what are the broken links you have to Core-AAM? I just >> checked Core-AAM and it seems I did apply the fix when >> publishing, so the ids are there on <tr>s. And I just checked >> SVG-AAM in the master branch (using a Respec snapshot) and don't >> find broken links to Core-AAM (nor to the others). >> >> >> You're correct, sorry. Core-AAM was showing up as broken links when I >> was testing the Editor's Draft, but they work for the TR version. In >> contrast, HTML-AAM was fine in ED, but not in TR. (Graphics-AAM is >> broken in both.) >> >> >> If there is a broken link that is the result of a publication >> fault, I can ask the webmaster for permission to fix. ... >> >> I wouldn't want to touch a Candidate Recommendation (though I can >> ask the webmaster for permission to fix, as for Core-AAM). >> >> >> >> I'd *hope* this would count as a purely technical fix, not a >> substantive change to the spec. But either way, I assume its going >> to require extra work for someone. So if Jason or someone else can >> fix the script properly first, that's great. >> >> But if you are able to start the process of asking the powers-that-be >> exactly how to make a fix like this to the published specs, that >> might help move things forward faster. > I've asked the webmaster for permission to fix this in place for > graphics-aam. I'll let you know when I have a response. Michael Graphics-AAM has been republished with the ids restored. Hopefully this unstick SVG-AAM publication. Michael >> >> ~A >> >
Received on Thursday, 19 April 2018 20:05:09 UTC