Re: CfC: Standing consent to publish updated Working Drafts

Hey Léonie.

We always include a ChangeLog with each WD. We do not intend to change
that practice.

--joanie

On 09/14/2018 04:05 PM, Léonie Watson wrote:
> I support this proposal if each WD will include a changelog, to make it
> easy for people to discover what has changed since the last WD was
> published. If this is not the intention, I object to this proposal.
> 
> 
> 
> On 14/09/2018 19:00, Janina Sajka wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> Janina
>>
>> Joanmarie Diggs writes:
>>> This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to the ARIA Working Group to provide
>>> standing consent to publish updated Working Drafts of all
>>> Recommendation-track and Note-track documents maintained by the ARIA
>>> Working Group. If this CfC is accepted, the Working Group will not need
>>> to provide consent to publish each Working Draft, and the outcome of
>>> this CfC will be used as the decision of record for publication of
>>> drafts as needed. This applies only to ordinary Working Drafts, not
>>> other stages which require formal transitions including First Public
>>> Working Draft, Candidate Recommendation, and later stages.
>>>
>>> Action
>>>
>>> This CfC is now open for objection, comment, as well as statements of
>>> support via email. Silence will be interpreted as support, though
>>> messages of support are certainly welcome.
>>>
>>> If you object to this proposal, or have comments concerning it, please
>>> respond by replying on list to this message no later than 12:00 Boston
>>> Time, Thursday, 20 September 2018.
>>>
>>> For objections only, please copy the main public-aria@w3.org list to
>>> allow technical discussion of the objection to happen there.
>>>
>>> Process
>>>
>>> This CfC is conducted per the ARIA WG decision policy:
>>> https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/decision-policy
>>
>

Received on Friday, 14 September 2018 22:02:25 UTC