- From: Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 21:05:42 +0100
- To: public-aria-admin@w3.org, public-aria@w3.org
I support this proposal if each WD will include a changelog, to make it easy for people to discover what has changed since the last WD was published. If this is not the intention, I object to this proposal. On 14/09/2018 19:00, Janina Sajka wrote: > +1 > > Janina > > Joanmarie Diggs writes: >> This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to the ARIA Working Group to provide >> standing consent to publish updated Working Drafts of all >> Recommendation-track and Note-track documents maintained by the ARIA >> Working Group. If this CfC is accepted, the Working Group will not need >> to provide consent to publish each Working Draft, and the outcome of >> this CfC will be used as the decision of record for publication of >> drafts as needed. This applies only to ordinary Working Drafts, not >> other stages which require formal transitions including First Public >> Working Draft, Candidate Recommendation, and later stages. >> >> Action >> >> This CfC is now open for objection, comment, as well as statements of >> support via email. Silence will be interpreted as support, though >> messages of support are certainly welcome. >> >> If you object to this proposal, or have comments concerning it, please >> respond by replying on list to this message no later than 12:00 Boston >> Time, Thursday, 20 September 2018. >> >> For objections only, please copy the main public-aria@w3.org list to >> allow technical discussion of the objection to happen there. >> >> Process >> >> This CfC is conducted per the ARIA WG decision policy: >> https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/decision-policy > -- @LeonieWatson @tink@toot.cafe Carpe diem
Received on Friday, 14 September 2018 20:06:30 UTC