- From: Aaron Leventhal <aleventhal@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 19:49:59 +0000
- To: "Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken" <tsiegman@wiley.com>, Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com>, ARIA Admin <public-aria-admin@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+1LECRChE4CGEF69w6sKg4vBLV-A_c_Daog-q4qsRE-SzU9LQ@mail.gmail.com>
+1 On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 3:30 PM Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken < tsiegman@wiley.com> wrote: > +1 > > Tzviya Siegman > Information Standards Lead > Wiley > 201-748-6884 <(201)%20748-6884> > tsiegman@wiley.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joanmarie Diggs [mailto:jdiggs@igalia.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 2:03 PM > To: ARIA Admin <public-aria-admin@w3.org> > Subject: CfC: ARIA 1.1 to advance to PR > > This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to the ARIA Working Group regarding > advancing ARIA 1.1 to Proposed Recommendation: > > Spec: https://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria-1.1/ > Implementation report: https://w3c.github.io/test-results/wai-aria/ > > At this time, the only thing for which we (officially) lack two > implementations are related to the addition of aria-activedescendant as a > supported property of the application role and of the searchbox role (as a > consequence of that role being created as part of ARIA 1.1). The results > for those three tests can be seen here: > https://w3c.github.io/test-results/wai-aria/less-than-2.html. The reason > I say "(officially)" is that I suspect that Firefox's IAccessible2 > implementation should be a PASS and not a FAIL, and that an issue in Jon's > ATTA might be the source of reported failures. In addition, if Microsoft > supplies us with the UIA ARIA 1.1 test results that they have stated are > forthcoming, that might be another source of a PASS for the three tests in > question. > > Given the overall results, my belief that we actually have at least two > PASSes for all tests, and a rapidly-approaching W3C publishing moratorium, > I'm proceeding with the CfC now. While the Working Group considers the > question at hand, I will work towards resolving the actual situation > regarding the aforementioned three tests. > > Action > > This CfC is now open for objection, comment, as well as statements of > support via email. Silence will be interpreted as support, though messages > of support are certainly welcome. > > If you object to this proposal, or have comments concerning it, please > respond by replying on list to this message no later than 12:00 Boston > Time, Monday, 23 October 2017. > > For objections only, please copy the main public-aria@w3.org list to > allow technical discussion of the objection to happen there. > > Process > > This CfC is conducted per the ARIA WG decision policy: > https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/decision-policy > >
Received on Tuesday, 17 October 2017 19:50:39 UTC