In March I was asked to draft a requirement related to SVG [1]. Rich also proposed some edits in response to my other comments [2]. I'm afraid I haven't been following any discussion on the document since then. Was there a conscious decision to leave this out, or was it an oversight? [1]: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria/2016Mar/0029.html [2]: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria/2016Mar/0030.html ~Amelia On 16 May 2016 at 09:24, Rich Schwerdtfeger <richschwer@gmail.com> wrote: > This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to the Accessible Rich Internet Applications (ARIA) Working Group on the following resolutions > > 1. Publish the first public working draft of the Requirements for ARIA 1.1 > > - http://w3c.github.io/aria/requirements/aria-requirements.html > > If you object to this proposal, or have comments concerning it, please respond by replying on list to this message no later than 23:49 (midnight) Boston Time, Monday, May 23, 2016. > > Rich > > — > Rich Schwerdtfeger, Email: richschwer@gmail.com <richschwer@gmail.com?Subject=Re%3A%206%20Day%20Call%20for%20Consensus%20May%2012%2C%202016%20ARIA%20Working%20Group%20Resolutions&In-Reply-To=%3C4F01E033-6229-48CB-B689-4F5961EE2EC8%40gmail.com%3E&References=%3C4F01E033-6229-48CB-B689-4F5961EE2EC8%40gmail.com%3E> > CTO Accessibility IBM Software: http://www.ibm.com.able > > The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) > Chair, Accessible Rich Internet Applications https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA <https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA> > > > > >
Received on Monday, 16 May 2016 15:48:30 UTC