- From: Tom Breton (Tehom) <tehom@panix.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:17:49 -0500
- Cc: "public-argumentation@w3.org" <public-argumentation@w3.org>
> Argumentation models and formats can facilitate new features for hypertext > documents, digital books and digital textbooks containing conversational, > mathematical, scientific, legal, and political argumentation. > Machine-utilizable argumentation structures can be added to documents with > RDFa (http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/, > http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-in-html/) and argumentation interchange and > representation formats > (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-argumentation/2012May/0001.html). Which existing argumentation representation formats are suitable for annotating general-purpose hypertext documents? Last I looked, none seemed capable of that. Tom Breton (Tehom)
Received on Monday, 31 December 2012 22:18:10 UTC