Re: Proposal submitted to Schema.org

Hi Richard,

Is there a recommended way to test out additional examples we might develop
using the proposal? Testing using something the Google Structured Data
Testing Tool leads to errors since the proposal is clearly not part of
Schema.org yet.

Cheers,
Mark

--
Mark A. Matienzo <mark@matienzo.org> | http://anarchivi.st/

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Roke, Elizabeth Russey <erussey@emory.edu>
wrote:

> I would add my thanks to Richard for keeping us on track.  What are the
> next steps for this?  Would commenting on the proposals or getting others
> to do so be helpful? Any sense of a timeline?
>
>
>
> Elizabeth
>
>
>
> ___________________________
>
> Elizabeth Russey Roke
>
> Digital Archivist
>
> Stuart A. Rose Manuscript, Archives, & Rare Book Library
>
> 404.727.2345 <(404)%20727-2345> | erussey@emory.edu
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "The Stuart A. Rose Manuscript, Archives, & Rare Book Library collects and
> connects stories of human experience, promotes access and learning, and
> offers opportunities for dialogue for all wise hearts who seek knowledge.”
>
>
>
> Read the Rose Library blog: https://scholarblogs.emory.edu/marbl/
>
>
>
> Like the Rose Library on Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/emorymarbl
>
>
>
> Follow the Rose Library on Twitter: https://twitter.com/EmoryRoseMARBL
>
>
>
> *From: *Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, September 28, 2017 at 4:46 PM
> *To: *Owen Stephens <owen@ostephens.com>
> *Cc: *public-architypes <public-architypes@w3.org>
> *Subject: *Re: Proposal submitted to Schema.org
> *Resent-From: *<public-architypes@w3.org>
> *Resent-Date: *Thursday, September 28, 2017 at 4:47 PM
>
>
>
> The *extent* proposal has now also been submitted as issue #1759
> <https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/1759>.
>
>
>
> ~Richard.
>
>
> Richard Wallis
>
> Founder, Data Liberate
>
> http://dataliberate.com
>
> Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis
>
> Twitter: @rjw
>
>
>
> On 28 September 2017 at 17:37, Owen Stephens <owen@ostephens.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks very much for doing this Richard and all your work around the
> proposal
>
>
>
> Owen
>
>
>
> Owen Stephens
>
> Owen Stephens Consulting
>
> Web: http://www.ostephens.com
> Email: owen@ostephens.com <owen@ostephens.com>
> Telephone: 0121 288 6936
>
>
>
> On 28 Sep 2017, at 16:50, Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Following on from our discussions I have submitted an outline proposal to
> the Schema.org community based around Archive/ArchiveComponent.  In
> parallel I have updated the demo site
> <http://archive.sdo-archive.appspot.com/> to match.
>
>
>
> You can see the proposal in Github issue #1758
> <https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/1758>
>
>
>
> Let’s see what feedback we get from the wider community.
>
>
>
> ~Richard.
>
>
>
>
> Richard Wallis
>
> Founder, Data Liberate
>
> http://dataliberate.com
>
> Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis
>
> Twitter: @rjw
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of
> the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
> information. If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
> or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly
> prohibited.
>
> If you have received this message in error, please contact
> the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the
> original message (including attachments).
>