W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-architypes@w3.org > February 2017

Re: Discussion about previous proposal

From: Owen Stephens <owen@ostephens.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 16:07:14 +0000
Message-Id: <A410BF2C-82AB-474B-9DFD-230C03362B31@ostephens.com>
Cc: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>, public-architypes <public-architypes@w3.org>
To: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>
So from what I can see the additional new (to sdo) properties we are talking about for ArchivedItem are:

accessAndUse (Details of conditions of access and use of the item(s).)
itemDescription (A document describing the item and/or its curation, history, etc.)
itemLocation (The [current] location of the item)
itemProvenance (Ownership history.)
itemTransfer (Transfer of item between places.)

We also have three properties that already 

hasPart (currently available to CreativeWork)
isPartOf (currently available to CreativeWork)
itemCondition (currently available to Product)

I’m not yet convinced any of this is unique to an item in an archive. To take the most obvious example to me - these could all apply to a rare book in a library as much to an item in an archive.
I can see a problem with itemCondition only currently being available to Product, but I think that applies more generally.

Is this a useful point to pick up some of the discussion? I’m not quite sure the best place to start - it just happens that this was the question that led me here :)


Owen Stephens
Owen Stephens Consulting
Web: http://www.ostephens.com
Email: owen@ostephens.com
Telephone: 0121 288 6936

> On 14 Feb 2017, at 15:43, Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com> wrote:
> On 14 February 2017 at 15:02, Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com <mailto:ehs@pobox.com>> wrote:
> Hi Richard,
> > On Feb 14, 2017, at 9:53 AM, Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com <mailto:richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>> wrote:
> >
> >       • To indicate a Thing (Book, ImageObject, Vehicle) is in an archive the ArchivedItem type is added as an additionalType.  This gives access, in addition to the normal properties for the type in question, to the archive specific properties, to use to markup the item.
> Do you have a sense of what these item-level, archive specific properties might be?
> //Ed
> >From the Initial Mode <https://www.w3.org/community/architypes/wiki/Initial_model>l in the Wiki  and represented on http://archive.sdo-archive.appspot.com/ArchivedItem <http://archive.sdo-archive.appspot.com/ArchivedItem>.
> accessAndUse, itemDescription, itemLocation, itemProvenance, itemTransfer  and other Schema properties having ArchivedItem added to their domainIncudes hasPart, isPartOf, http://archive.sdo-archive.appspot.com/ArchivedItem <http://archive.sdo-archive.appspot.com/ArchivedItem>.
> Richard Wallis
> Founder, Data Liberate
> http://dataliberate.com <http://dataliberate.com/>
> Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis <http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis>
> Twitter: @rjw

Received on Tuesday, 14 February 2017 16:07:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:57:13 UTC