W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-architypes@w3.org > April 2017

Re: Archive Collection and Archived Item

From: Giovanni Michetti <giovanni.michetti@ubc.ca>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 18:30:57 +0200
To: Jane Stevenson <Jane.Stevenson@jisc.ac.uk>
CC: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>, public-architypes <public-architypes@w3.org>
Message-ID: <f9586974-06e8-f523-67ba-2fe537edbe45@ubc.ca>
In my opinion, choosing an adequate name is a desirable requirement.
Choosing a definition that is not open to misinterpration is a mandatory 
requirement :-)

Giovanni



Il 11/04/2017 18:18, Jane Stevenson ha scritto:
> [...] Personally, I accept Richard’s argument that the name isn’t so important in principle, but I think in practice its best to give it a name and definition that is less open to mis-interpretation.
> 
> regards,
> Jane.
Received on Tuesday, 11 April 2017 16:29:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 August 2018 13:28:59 UTC