AR Standards Community Scope and Web-based AR

>> CP: 1. Will this not run the risk of fragmenting the community and run
>> contrary to the goals of all the community members?
>
> RM: I don't believe so.  This would be like saying the OGC's ARML 
> activity is fragmenting the ARStandards.org work too...which I don't 
> believe is the case.
/CP: This is not a good analogy because the AR Standards Community *does 
not* seek to develop standards while the OGC ARML 2.0 SWG *is* a 
Standards development activity.//
//
//The Augmented Web also (like AR Standards Community) does not seek to 
develop standards.//
/
>
> <snip>
>
> RM: So there are many things that the ARStandards.org community will 
> discuss that do not directly relate to the Augmented Web. And in 
> reverse there are specifically Web related topics that the Augmented 
> Web group will discuss that many within the ARStandards.org community 
> may see as a distraction.
/CP: I think that everyone in AR Standards Community is interested in 
Web-related topics that impact AR. But, yes, there are other topics of 
interest as well./
> <snip>
> RM: I think cross posting makes good sense in a lot of cases and I'm 
> happy to take charge of that if you would like this.  But there are 
> also things that the Augmented Web community should be discussing that 
> are not just standards related and I think many people on the 
> ARStandards.org discussion list may see this as irrelevant or a 
> distraction. 
/CP: Yes, at this point, ///please cross post/. Thanks!/

Christine