- From: Arve Bersvendsen <arveb@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 23:00:54 +0200
- To: "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w3.org>, "Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)" <skw@hp.com>
- Cc: "Dan Brickley" <danbri@danbri.org>, "Marcos Caceres" <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>, "Jon Ferraiolo" <jferrai@us.ibm.com>
On Wed, 28 May 2008 17:27:27 +0200, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org> wrote: > It is important I think that the package itself have an HTTP URI. > Yes, there will be times when you don't retrieve it in the normal course > of business, and times when it is aggressively cached (what we call > installation), but it should have an HTTP URI for all the normal reasons. No, there are times where a widget or resource does not have _any_ meaningful origin URL, e.g. an unsigned and untrusted widget/zip retrieved over MMS or bluetooth, or copied on to a device in terms of direct filesystem access. Are you proposing UA's should then make up that origin URL as a HTTP URI? -- Arve Bersvendsen Developer, Opera Software ASA, http://www.opera.com/
Received on Wednesday, 28 May 2008 21:02:30 UTC