Re: ACTION-161: Rewording for requirement 3

Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2008-01-31 17:43:12 -0800, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> 
>> Must be deployable to IIS and Apache without requiring actions by the server 
>> administrator in a configuration where the user can upload static files, run 
>> serverside scripts (such as PHP, ASP, and CGI), control http headers, and 
>> control authorization, but only do this for URIs under a given set of 
>> subdirectories on the server.
>>
>>
>> Not sure if there is a better more technical term for "URIs under a given 
>> set of subdirectories on the server". The idea is that the user might only 
>> have access to control "/~sicking" and "/trip-planner-2010" and resources 
>> under those directories.
> 
> I would like this to not mention specific products of any particular
> vendor.
> 
> Please phrase this generically in terms of the user being able to
> control a static resource, being able to control http headers, and
> authorization.
> 
> (I think I said that on the call already.)

I really dislike mentioning specific servers too, but when I used the 
wording "typical" then that got lots of negative feedback too.

So the only thing I can think of is to revert "IIS and Apache" back to 
"commonly installed servers". Other than that I'm out of ideas but would 
welcome other suggestions.

/ Jonas

Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2008 11:06:22 UTC