- From: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:35:42 -0400
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: public-appformats@w3.org
Could it be, 'requesting URI', please? Tim On 2007-06 -13, at 07:18, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Mon, 21 May 2007 16:53:46 +0200, Anne van Kesteren > <annevk@opera.com> wrote: >>> 1. The term "request URI" is a confusing term for the URI of the >>> source making the request, when the HTTP request has a URI in it >>> which is the requested URI. It isn't the URI of the requesting >>> client, either. Suggest: codebase URI? This is like 'codebase >>> principals' in existing security models. >> >> I'll look into this when updating the document. > > I made it "requesting URL" as suggested by Jonas. > > > -- > Anne van Kesteren > <http://annevankesteren.nl/> > <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2007 15:35:47 UTC