- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:15:29 +0200
- To: "Thomas Roessler" <tlr@w3.org>
- Cc: "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>, "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:01:31 +0200, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> wrote: > On 2007-06-13 11:19:53 +0200, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > >> You could use >> >> <?access-control allow="*" exclude="*"?> > > That's actually the equivalent of a no-op, unless semantics have > changed dramatically. Not sure what you mean with no-op. It would always deny access as long as the access control policy applies. >> However, I added <?access-control deny=...?> for now. > > I continue to be opposed to this, for all the reasons stated > earlier. Do you have a proposed alternative solution? And maybe a pointer to your earlier stated reasons? -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2007 13:15:43 UTC