- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 23:36:36 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Cyril Concolato <cyril.concolato@enst.fr>
- Cc: karl@w3.org, public-appformats@w3.org
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Cyril Concolato wrote: > > I, too, agree with this comment. I don't understand the notion of > semantic free. An element is given semantic not by pure magic but > because there is a specification describing its semantics. There is no > such thing as (universally) semantic-free XML element. There are XML > elements whose semantics are unknown to a particular implementation. > What you probably want to say is that any implementation has a behavior > when encountering an element whose semantics is not known to that > implementation. And you want that same behavior to apply to XBL elements > in error. But, to solve the issue, I would propose to remove ", treating > them as they would any arbitrary semantic-free XML element". I think > "ignore" is enough. Fair enough. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 5 January 2007 23:36:46 UTC