Re: [XBL] XBL 2.0 id and xml:id

On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Cyril Concolato wrote:
> 
> My point is that the term 'expected' should be clarified. You seem to 
> think: A) it's expected by the implementation (which implements XBL and 
> other specifications), some think it's B) expected by the specification. 
> A implies B but the opposite is not true. Usually when reading 
> specifications you think of B. Please clarify.

Clarified.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Friday, 5 January 2007 23:33:31 UTC