- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 00:23:51 +0000 (UTC)
- To: $B9u_79d;V(B(KUROSAWA, Takeshi) <taken.spc@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-appformats@w3.org
Received on Friday, 5 January 2007 00:24:02 UTC
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, น๕฿ทนไปึ(KUROSAWA, Takeshi) wrote: > > I think the XBL 2.0 should define a unique string for the SVG Feature > String [1], the DOMImplementation.hasFeauture[2] and such things. # the > namespace for the XBL 2.0? Agreed. Added. (Although, to comply with the SVG specification, I added a requiredExtension URI based on the namespace, with a version suffix, rather than using the namespace URI as a feature string.) Let me know if that's acceptable! Cheers, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 5 January 2007 00:24:02 UTC