- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 08:53:35 +1100
- To: public-appformats@w3.org
Hi. This is a last call comment on the XBL 2 Editor’s Draft (dated 23 January 2007). Ian previously stated that whether elements are in the flattened tree or not determines only whether they are rendered. Also there is this text in 4.9.1: Shadow content is not considered part of a document, so elements that are defined to trigger when they are "inserted into the document" do not trigger during binding attachment. However, in SMIL documents and SVG documents with SMIL animation elements in them, it is whether the element is in the document that determines if it is processed. Since shadow content is not part of the document, any animation elements inside shadow content would not be processed, which is clearly undesirable. I think it would make sense for the “time container structure” of the document to be based on the flattened tree. This definition could go in XBL, just like the definition of how group rendering changes in SVG. I also think it would be good to coordinate with SYMM to ensure this (and the animation targetting behaviour) is specified appropriately. Thanks, Cameron -- Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/ xmpp:heycam@jabber.org ▪ ICQ 26955922 ▪ MSN cam@mcc.id.au
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2007 21:53:59 UTC