- From: Matthew Raymond <mattraymond@earthlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 15:02:58 -0400
- To: Mihai Sucan <mihai.sucan@gmail.com>
- CC: public-appformats@w3.org
Mihai Sucan wrote: > I agree with your position. Good to know I'm not alone. > Just two comments: > > Le Fri, 01 Sep 2006 14:12:14 +0300, Matthew Raymond > <mattraymond@earthlink.net> a écrit: >> 2) Web Forms 2.0 will likely be implemented on most if not all major >> browsers within a few of years. (In fact, Opera already has at least >> some support, and Mozilla has already begun implementation.) > > AFAIK, Opera has complete support for WF2. It's experimental, but > complete, and, of course, there's room for improvement. Okay. I thought as much, but I wasn't sure. >> 2) DHTML implementations of the current XForms would need less code and >> would run faster when built on top of WF2. > > XBL2 could also be used for implementating XForms and it would run even > faster on top of WF2. XBL 2.0 would only be used for the binding. The actual implementation bound to the elements would be DHTML + WF2.
Received on Friday, 1 September 2006 19:03:32 UTC