- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 23:15:52 +0000 (UTC)
- To: karl@w3.org
- Cc: public-appformats@w3.org
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 karl@w3.org wrote: > > Is there any reasons for not using xml:id No, no reason; xml:id may be used if the author desires. xml:id is completely orthogonal to XBL, and is defined in another specification. > and if any what's happening when both attributes are present in the XBL > XML fragment? Nothing exciting; the processing rules of XBL and xml:id do not, to my knowledge, in any way conflict. > Please, mention it in XBL specification. Why? Do you think the xml:id specification would mention XBL? The two specifications are completely orthogonal and there does not seem to be any good reason for them to unnecessarily cross-reference each other. > Please, make it reviewed by XML Core WG. I have sent a request: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2006Oct/0004.html Please let me know if this does not satisfy your comment. Cheers, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 5 October 2006 23:16:02 UTC