Re: javascript: IRI scheme

Krzysztof Maczynski wrote:
> In my opinion, the name „javascript:” is misleading.

How is it misleading?

> Could it be changed to „ecmascript:” or at least the two declared 
> equivalent?

That wouldn't be backwards compatible with anything and would have no 
benefit.

-- 
Lachlan Hunt
http://lachy.id.au/

Received on Wednesday, 23 August 2006 23:17:56 UTC