- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 04:53:26 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Doug Schepers <doug.schepers@vectoreal.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org, public-appformats@w3.org
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006, Doug Schepers wrote: > Ian Hickson wrote: > > > > Yup, XBL handles printing in the same way it handles screen or other > > media. It's media-independent. > > Since shadow trees are not in the DOM, the serialization of the content > must be made explicit in the XBL2 spec, such that it is clear that the > print version matches the XBL shadow content. See sections 5.5 and 5.7.2. As far as I can tell this, is already covered. > And must this be mandatory, or can the user choose to print the source > file? That presumably is rather up to the UA. > There should be a discussion about the implications of the inclusion of > CSS printing facilities (media="print", @print, importing print). This > may be complicated if a HTML page that has inherent print styles is > "transformed" via XBL such that it has conflicting print styles. I don't understand... could you show a concrete example of what you mean here? -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 19 August 2006 04:53:51 UTC