- From: Gottfried Zimmermann <gzimmermann@zi7n.de>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 15:01:28 +0000
- To: W3C WAI Accessible Platform Architectures <public-apa@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <b1c60fd2714f4083a7edcdbcb1e867f2@zi7n.de>
See https://www.w3.org/2025/03/12-apa-minutes.html and below.
Best,
Gottfried
[Logo: Kompetenzzentrum Digitale Barrierefreiheit]<https://barrierefreiheit.hdm-stuttgart.de/>
[Logo: Hochschule der Medien]<https://www.hdm-stuttgart.de/>
Onlineangebote des Kompetenzzentrums Digitale Barrierefreiheit:
§ Abokurse<https://barrierefreiheit.hdm-stuttgart.de/abo-kurse/> zum Selbstlernen, auch als Team
§ TRAINomat<https://trainomat.bf-lernen.de/>: Meine persönliche Ressourcensammlung
§ Kursangebote: Grundlagen<https://digitalisierung.hdm-stuttgart.de/barrierefreiheit/einfuehrung-in-web-barrierefreiheit-web-accessibility/> | Web-Barrierefreiheit<https://digitalisierung.hdm-stuttgart.de/barrierefreiheit/einfuehrung-in-web-barrierefreiheit-web-accessibility/> | Workshop-Katalog<https://digitalisierung.hdm-stuttgart.de/barrierefreiheit/workshop-katalog/>
§ YouTube Playlists: Masterthesen<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5mia8RQpUOg&list=PLNVCxdMrGvQl9LnWPU5OcbcbUXCSonADz> | Bachelorthesen<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3PWcBHQt45o&list=PLNVCxdMrGvQnsP2_FnG6bdvrs0UB7xk7P> | Usability Projekte<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOS3F29rIm8&list=PLNVCxdMrGvQlaCtmUv7RMJJxt0RLtGlRf> |
Smarthome-Projekte<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rn_9uWXsB5c&list=PLNVCxdMrGvQm7L8ZzTCffs9jgmbEkIOnr> | Webinare<https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLNVCxdMrGvQlteN1Qd99X-EjTGlx6If0V> | WCAG 2.1 erklärt<https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLNVCxdMrGvQmJfGplIu4wq6GpQG12Z3MT> | Von Anfang an<https://gpii.eu/vonanfangan/>
§ Abschlussarbeiten<https://www.zotero.org/groups/5070492/hdm-zimmermann-abschlussarbeiten/library> | Netzwerke<https://cloud.mi.hdm-stuttgart.de/s/4jZdW29icN85trG> | Veranstaltungen<https://cloud.mi.hdm-stuttgart.de/s/mNNrk4x3Ggpo8zK>
§ Abonnieren Sie unseren Newsletter<https://digitalisierung.hdm-stuttgart.de/barrierefreiheit/newsletter/>, um auf dem Laufenden zu bleiben
§ Mailingliste für Jobangebote in Barrierefreiheit<https://www.listserv.dfn.de/sympa/admin/hdm-bf-job-market>
[IAAP Certified CPWA]
Prof. Dr. Gottfried Zimmermann
Professor Mobile User Interaction
Hochschule der Medien Stuttgart
Email gzimmermann@acm.org<mailto:gzimmermann@acm.org>
Web www.hdm-stuttgart.de/home/gzimmermann<http://www.hdm-stuttgart.de/home/gzimmermann>
Publications www.zotero.org/gzimmermann<http://www.zotero.org/gzimmermann>
Phone +49 711 8923-2751
Büro: Nobelstr. 5, Stuttgart-Vaihingen<https://goo.gl/maps/pvYsfQML4dZTPc4P7>
Postadresse: Nobelstr. 10, 70569 Stuttgart
[1]W3C
[1] https://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
APA Weekly Teleconference
12 Mar 2025
[2]IRC log.
[2] https://www.w3.org/2025/03/12-apa-irc
Attendees
Present
chiace, chiace7, Gottfried, janina, JonCohn, matatk,
PaulG, Roy_Ruoxi
Regrets
Demelza, Dr_Keith, Fredrik
Chair
Janina
Scribe
Gottfried
Contents
1. [3]Agenda Review & Announcements
2. [4]APA re-chartering
3. [5]New Draft Charters
1. [6]Distributed Tracing Working Group Charter
4. [7]CSS inert review
5. [8]Spec review requests
1. [9]webauthn-3
6. [10]Comment review requests
1. [11]Comment String Searching
2. [12]Email: Comment: WCAG 3.0 accessibility guidelines:
Accessing a "virtual" meeting using a teleconferencing
application such as Zoom - receipt of streamed text
content
7. [13]CSS Update (Paul)
Meeting minutes
<janina> /me [14]https://rednote.net/scuba250306.mov
[14] https://rednote.net/scuba250306.mov
<matatk> regrets Fredrik
Agenda Review & Announcements
janina1: Community group on XR captioning working on a working
draft
<janina> [15]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/
public-apa-admin/2025Mar/0000.html
[15] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa-admin/2025Mar/0000.html
janina1: FPWD on accessibility in AI systems. First on content
creation, but other topics will be added.
... In the editor's draft, there is some more information on
which topics may be added and requested for more information.
Chiara: Where can we contribute topics?
janina1: In the doc, there are instructions on contributing
either by GitHub or be email.
... Your are also welcome to join the Research Questions Task
Force.
chiace7: Have students working on master degree, may contribute
to the topic.
janina1: We will have to add you by hand to the task force
calendar and mailing list.
... Everybody in APA
... in APA is welcome to contribute to all 6 task forces
... explains status of FPWD
APA re-chartering
janina1: We hoped to make it in March, but will slip to April
... Specifications in community groups don't show on our radar.
We do this for WG specs.
... So, for community groups, we will need a review process.
... Upcoming Advisory Committee meeting might empower APA to do
this.
... Hopefully we will add a brief clause about TAG-identified
work from certain community groups.
matatk: Good summary.
New Draft Charters
Distributed Tracing Working Group Charter
<Roy_Ruoxi> - issue: [16]w3c/strategy#495
[16] https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues/495
<Roy_Ruoxi> - charter: [17]https://w3c.github.io/
charter-drafts/2025/distributed-tracing-wg.html
[17] https://w3c.github.io/charter-drafts/2025/distributed-tracing-wg.html
Roy_Ruoxi: Looks relative low-level, related to protocols. I am
good with this charter..
janina1: Anybody objecting?
(no objection)
CSS inert review
<matatk> Background reading (from agenda announcement):
[18]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2025Mar/
0004.html
[18] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2025Mar/0004.html
<matatk> For convenience, links from the background reading, in
case you need them on the call...
<matatk> Explainer for CSS carousel features (including inert):
[19]https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/blob/main/
css-overflow-5/carousel-explainer.md
[19] https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/blob/main/css-overflow-5/carousel-explainer.md
<matatk> TAG design review thread (featuring Alice's comment):
[20]w3ctag/design-reviews#1055
[20] https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1055
<matatk> Background CSS WG discussion (featuring more details
on the concerns): [21]w3c/csswg-drafts#10711
[21] https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10711
<matatk> Some questions I think we need to answer...
<matatk> 1. What level of concern do we have?
<matatk> 2. Would restricting inert to the top layer be
sufficient?
<matatk> 3. What questions do we have?
<matatk> Any thoughts?
matatk: Everything is in my email, no need to scribe.
<chiace7> The current proposal for interactivity: inert is not
tied to visible elements, which could lead to excessive or
unintentional use. Has a mechanism been considered to visually
indicate the "inert" state to developers (e.g., via DevTools or
a specific pseudo-class like :inert)? If so, how could this
mitigate implementation risks?
matatk: Alice had this concern as well. Suggested limiting it
to the top layer which are usually styled visually.
<chiace7> Is there a plan to provide clear guidelines on when
interactivity: inert should (or should not) be used? For
example, in carousel design, how can we ensure that developers
do not make entire sections of the page inert, compromising
accessibility?
matatk: We would like for APA to have a consensus on this.
matatk: We do not want to make it super easy to make mistakes.
janina1: This seems to be more of a UI concern?
matatk: It may be a bit more. It does not change presentation,
but functionality and focusability of things.
... This is a new thing in CSS.
janina1: So it could be the stocking horse for other things of
this kind?
... So, at some point WCAG 3.0 will need to talk about it.
matatk: Would come in as technique.
... With other complex features in CSS, the building blocks have
been useful. In the context of carousels, scrolling and
inertness are addressed as well.
... My concern: If people start to make things inert that are not
visible... What are the other use cases for this, except
carousels?
janina1: I feel we should move forward provisionally.
PaulG: I don't like carousels. Focus issues, arrow keying.
... You could do this with something else. Designers use them too
much, developers do a bad job.
chiace7: Could work well in CSS. But could be overused by
designers, in particular for offscreen elements.
... We need guidance on when to use it when not, regarding
usability and accessibility.
<matatk> ack
matatk: There are many ways to do carousels. Trying to fit all
carousels in this scheme will not work.
... We are concerned about the documentation for developers and
the potential for misuse by developers.
... Interested in use cases which requires a CSS property rather
than a simple HTML attribute.
... Are there other types of carousels other than apg?
PaulG: Larger list is on a different computer - will send it by
email.
matatk: Propose to make an APA comment on our mailing list,
expressing our concerns. Any objections?
(no objections)
janina1: We need to ask them WHY this is needed in CSS rather
than HTML?
Spec review requests
webauthn-3
<matatk> Review request (public-facing thread): [22]w3c/
a11y-request#101
[22] https://github.com/w3c/a11y-request/issues/101
<matatk> Due: 2025-03-31
<matatk> Changes in this version: [23]https://www.w3.org/TR/
2025/WD-webauthn-3-20250127/#changes-since-l2
[23] https://www.w3.org/TR/2025/WD-webauthn-3-20250127/#changes-since-l2
<matatk> Accessibility Considerations section: [24]https://
www.w3.org/TR/2025/
WD-webauthn-3-20250127/#sctn-accessiblility-considerations
[24] https://www.w3.org/TR/2025/WD-webauthn-3-20250127/#sctn-accessiblility-considerations
<matatk> Previous APA review, including Fredrik's comments:
<[25]https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/
Web_Authentication:_An_API_for_accessing_Public_Key_Credentials
_-_Level_3>
[25] https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Web_Authentication:_An_API_for_accessing_Public_Key_Credentials_-_Level_3
matatk: Review in progress on Web authentication 3.
... To look at: Accessibility considerations sections, are our
previous concerns addressed?
Comment review requests
Comment String Searching
<matatk> source: (Proposed APA comment, in draft)
<matatk> tracking: [26]w3c/a11y-review#222
[26] https://github.com/w3c/a11y-review/issues/222
<matatk> previous minutes: [27]https://www.w3.org/2025/02/
05-apa-minutes.html#eed7
[27] https://www.w3.org/2025/02/05-apa-minutes.html#eed7
matatk: This is a FPWD.
... Paul had a good comment on it. We will progress this comment
as soon as possible.
janina1: We can always address coga comments later.
Email: Comment: WCAG 3.0 accessibility guidelines: Accessing a
"virtual" meeting using a teleconferencing application such as Zoom
- receipt of streamed text content
<matatk> source: [28]w3c/silver#476
[28] https://github.com/w3c/silver/issues/476
<matatk> tracking: [29]w3c/a11y-review#223
[29] https://github.com/w3c/a11y-review/issues/223
matatk: About difficulty of accessing streaming text in a web
conference.
... Braille reading has a "speed limit" - bandwidth is smaller
for somebody who is deaf-blind.
... We need to find ways to summarize the contents of a meeting.
... It is now in the WCAG3 repository.
... There is something that could be added to the user reqs. But
not sure we should do this.
<janina> [30]https://www.w3.org/TR/ctaur/#social
[30] https://www.w3.org/TR/ctaur/#social
matatk: For RQTF to consider...
janina1: Now we can reference it with our RTC comments.
matatk: Is there anything objective to say about this?
janina1: Hard to say. Simple solution: "Accommodate the people
you have. Be mindful."
CSS Update (Paul)
janina1: Any other business?
(none)
Meeting is adjourned
Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
[31]scribe.perl version 244 (Thu Feb 27 01:23:09 2025 UTC).
[31] https://w3c.github.io/scribe2/scribedoc.html
Diagnostics
Succeeded: s/AOA/APA/
Succeeded: s/ITTF/RQTF/
Maybe present: Chiara, janina1
All speakers: chiace7, Chiara, janina1, matatk, PaulG,
Roy_Ruoxi
Active on IRC: chiace7, Gottfried, Gottfried_, janina, JonCohn,
matatk, PaulG, Roy_Ruoxi
Attachments
- image/png attachment: image001.png
- image/jpeg attachment: image002.jpg
- image/png attachment: image003.png
Received on Wednesday, 12 March 2025 15:01:35 UTC