- From: Gottfried Zimmermann <gzimmermann@zi7n.de>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 15:01:28 +0000
- To: W3C WAI Accessible Platform Architectures <public-apa@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <b1c60fd2714f4083a7edcdbcb1e867f2@zi7n.de>
See https://www.w3.org/2025/03/12-apa-minutes.html and below. Best, Gottfried [Logo: Kompetenzzentrum Digitale Barrierefreiheit]<https://barrierefreiheit.hdm-stuttgart.de/> [Logo: Hochschule der Medien]<https://www.hdm-stuttgart.de/> Onlineangebote des Kompetenzzentrums Digitale Barrierefreiheit: § Abokurse<https://barrierefreiheit.hdm-stuttgart.de/abo-kurse/> zum Selbstlernen, auch als Team § TRAINomat<https://trainomat.bf-lernen.de/>: Meine persönliche Ressourcensammlung § Kursangebote: Grundlagen<https://digitalisierung.hdm-stuttgart.de/barrierefreiheit/einfuehrung-in-web-barrierefreiheit-web-accessibility/> | Web-Barrierefreiheit<https://digitalisierung.hdm-stuttgart.de/barrierefreiheit/einfuehrung-in-web-barrierefreiheit-web-accessibility/> | Workshop-Katalog<https://digitalisierung.hdm-stuttgart.de/barrierefreiheit/workshop-katalog/> § YouTube Playlists: Masterthesen<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5mia8RQpUOg&list=PLNVCxdMrGvQl9LnWPU5OcbcbUXCSonADz> | Bachelorthesen<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3PWcBHQt45o&list=PLNVCxdMrGvQnsP2_FnG6bdvrs0UB7xk7P> | Usability Projekte<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOS3F29rIm8&list=PLNVCxdMrGvQlaCtmUv7RMJJxt0RLtGlRf> | Smarthome-Projekte<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rn_9uWXsB5c&list=PLNVCxdMrGvQm7L8ZzTCffs9jgmbEkIOnr> | Webinare<https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLNVCxdMrGvQlteN1Qd99X-EjTGlx6If0V> | WCAG 2.1 erklärt<https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLNVCxdMrGvQmJfGplIu4wq6GpQG12Z3MT> | Von Anfang an<https://gpii.eu/vonanfangan/> § Abschlussarbeiten<https://www.zotero.org/groups/5070492/hdm-zimmermann-abschlussarbeiten/library> | Netzwerke<https://cloud.mi.hdm-stuttgart.de/s/4jZdW29icN85trG> | Veranstaltungen<https://cloud.mi.hdm-stuttgart.de/s/mNNrk4x3Ggpo8zK> § Abonnieren Sie unseren Newsletter<https://digitalisierung.hdm-stuttgart.de/barrierefreiheit/newsletter/>, um auf dem Laufenden zu bleiben § Mailingliste für Jobangebote in Barrierefreiheit<https://www.listserv.dfn.de/sympa/admin/hdm-bf-job-market> [IAAP Certified CPWA] Prof. Dr. Gottfried Zimmermann Professor Mobile User Interaction Hochschule der Medien Stuttgart Email gzimmermann@acm.org<mailto:gzimmermann@acm.org> Web www.hdm-stuttgart.de/home/gzimmermann<http://www.hdm-stuttgart.de/home/gzimmermann> Publications www.zotero.org/gzimmermann<http://www.zotero.org/gzimmermann> Phone +49 711 8923-2751 Büro: Nobelstr. 5, Stuttgart-Vaihingen<https://goo.gl/maps/pvYsfQML4dZTPc4P7> Postadresse: Nobelstr. 10, 70569 Stuttgart [1]W3C [1] https://www.w3.org/ - DRAFT - APA Weekly Teleconference 12 Mar 2025 [2]IRC log. [2] https://www.w3.org/2025/03/12-apa-irc Attendees Present chiace, chiace7, Gottfried, janina, JonCohn, matatk, PaulG, Roy_Ruoxi Regrets Demelza, Dr_Keith, Fredrik Chair Janina Scribe Gottfried Contents 1. [3]Agenda Review & Announcements 2. [4]APA re-chartering 3. [5]New Draft Charters 1. [6]Distributed Tracing Working Group Charter 4. [7]CSS inert review 5. [8]Spec review requests 1. [9]webauthn-3 6. [10]Comment review requests 1. [11]Comment String Searching 2. [12]Email: Comment: WCAG 3.0 accessibility guidelines: Accessing a "virtual" meeting using a teleconferencing application such as Zoom - receipt of streamed text content 7. [13]CSS Update (Paul) Meeting minutes <janina> /me [14]https://rednote.net/scuba250306.mov [14] https://rednote.net/scuba250306.mov <matatk> regrets Fredrik Agenda Review & Announcements janina1: Community group on XR captioning working on a working draft <janina> [15]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ public-apa-admin/2025Mar/0000.html [15] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa-admin/2025Mar/0000.html janina1: FPWD on accessibility in AI systems. First on content creation, but other topics will be added. ... In the editor's draft, there is some more information on which topics may be added and requested for more information. Chiara: Where can we contribute topics? janina1: In the doc, there are instructions on contributing either by GitHub or be email. ... Your are also welcome to join the Research Questions Task Force. chiace7: Have students working on master degree, may contribute to the topic. janina1: We will have to add you by hand to the task force calendar and mailing list. ... Everybody in APA ... in APA is welcome to contribute to all 6 task forces ... explains status of FPWD APA re-chartering janina1: We hoped to make it in March, but will slip to April ... Specifications in community groups don't show on our radar. We do this for WG specs. ... So, for community groups, we will need a review process. ... Upcoming Advisory Committee meeting might empower APA to do this. ... Hopefully we will add a brief clause about TAG-identified work from certain community groups. matatk: Good summary. New Draft Charters Distributed Tracing Working Group Charter <Roy_Ruoxi> - issue: [16]w3c/strategy#495 [16] https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues/495 <Roy_Ruoxi> - charter: [17]https://w3c.github.io/ charter-drafts/2025/distributed-tracing-wg.html [17] https://w3c.github.io/charter-drafts/2025/distributed-tracing-wg.html Roy_Ruoxi: Looks relative low-level, related to protocols. I am good with this charter.. janina1: Anybody objecting? (no objection) CSS inert review <matatk> Background reading (from agenda announcement): [18]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2025Mar/ 0004.html [18] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2025Mar/0004.html <matatk> For convenience, links from the background reading, in case you need them on the call... <matatk> Explainer for CSS carousel features (including inert): [19]https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/blob/main/ css-overflow-5/carousel-explainer.md [19] https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/blob/main/css-overflow-5/carousel-explainer.md <matatk> TAG design review thread (featuring Alice's comment): [20]w3ctag/design-reviews#1055 [20] https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1055 <matatk> Background CSS WG discussion (featuring more details on the concerns): [21]w3c/csswg-drafts#10711 [21] https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10711 <matatk> Some questions I think we need to answer... <matatk> 1. What level of concern do we have? <matatk> 2. Would restricting inert to the top layer be sufficient? <matatk> 3. What questions do we have? <matatk> Any thoughts? matatk: Everything is in my email, no need to scribe. <chiace7> The current proposal for interactivity: inert is not tied to visible elements, which could lead to excessive or unintentional use. Has a mechanism been considered to visually indicate the "inert" state to developers (e.g., via DevTools or a specific pseudo-class like :inert)? If so, how could this mitigate implementation risks? matatk: Alice had this concern as well. Suggested limiting it to the top layer which are usually styled visually. <chiace7> Is there a plan to provide clear guidelines on when interactivity: inert should (or should not) be used? For example, in carousel design, how can we ensure that developers do not make entire sections of the page inert, compromising accessibility? matatk: We would like for APA to have a consensus on this. matatk: We do not want to make it super easy to make mistakes. janina1: This seems to be more of a UI concern? matatk: It may be a bit more. It does not change presentation, but functionality and focusability of things. ... This is a new thing in CSS. janina1: So it could be the stocking horse for other things of this kind? ... So, at some point WCAG 3.0 will need to talk about it. matatk: Would come in as technique. ... With other complex features in CSS, the building blocks have been useful. In the context of carousels, scrolling and inertness are addressed as well. ... My concern: If people start to make things inert that are not visible... What are the other use cases for this, except carousels? janina1: I feel we should move forward provisionally. PaulG: I don't like carousels. Focus issues, arrow keying. ... You could do this with something else. Designers use them too much, developers do a bad job. chiace7: Could work well in CSS. But could be overused by designers, in particular for offscreen elements. ... We need guidance on when to use it when not, regarding usability and accessibility. <matatk> ack matatk: There are many ways to do carousels. Trying to fit all carousels in this scheme will not work. ... We are concerned about the documentation for developers and the potential for misuse by developers. ... Interested in use cases which requires a CSS property rather than a simple HTML attribute. ... Are there other types of carousels other than apg? PaulG: Larger list is on a different computer - will send it by email. matatk: Propose to make an APA comment on our mailing list, expressing our concerns. Any objections? (no objections) janina1: We need to ask them WHY this is needed in CSS rather than HTML? Spec review requests webauthn-3 <matatk> Review request (public-facing thread): [22]w3c/ a11y-request#101 [22] https://github.com/w3c/a11y-request/issues/101 <matatk> Due: 2025-03-31 <matatk> Changes in this version: [23]https://www.w3.org/TR/ 2025/WD-webauthn-3-20250127/#changes-since-l2 [23] https://www.w3.org/TR/2025/WD-webauthn-3-20250127/#changes-since-l2 <matatk> Accessibility Considerations section: [24]https:// www.w3.org/TR/2025/ WD-webauthn-3-20250127/#sctn-accessiblility-considerations [24] https://www.w3.org/TR/2025/WD-webauthn-3-20250127/#sctn-accessiblility-considerations <matatk> Previous APA review, including Fredrik's comments: <[25]https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/ Web_Authentication:_An_API_for_accessing_Public_Key_Credentials _-_Level_3> [25] https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Web_Authentication:_An_API_for_accessing_Public_Key_Credentials_-_Level_3 matatk: Review in progress on Web authentication 3. ... To look at: Accessibility considerations sections, are our previous concerns addressed? Comment review requests Comment String Searching <matatk> source: (Proposed APA comment, in draft) <matatk> tracking: [26]w3c/a11y-review#222 [26] https://github.com/w3c/a11y-review/issues/222 <matatk> previous minutes: [27]https://www.w3.org/2025/02/ 05-apa-minutes.html#eed7 [27] https://www.w3.org/2025/02/05-apa-minutes.html#eed7 matatk: This is a FPWD. ... Paul had a good comment on it. We will progress this comment as soon as possible. janina1: We can always address coga comments later. Email: Comment: WCAG 3.0 accessibility guidelines: Accessing a "virtual" meeting using a teleconferencing application such as Zoom - receipt of streamed text content <matatk> source: [28]w3c/silver#476 [28] https://github.com/w3c/silver/issues/476 <matatk> tracking: [29]w3c/a11y-review#223 [29] https://github.com/w3c/a11y-review/issues/223 matatk: About difficulty of accessing streaming text in a web conference. ... Braille reading has a "speed limit" - bandwidth is smaller for somebody who is deaf-blind. ... We need to find ways to summarize the contents of a meeting. ... It is now in the WCAG3 repository. ... There is something that could be added to the user reqs. But not sure we should do this. <janina> [30]https://www.w3.org/TR/ctaur/#social [30] https://www.w3.org/TR/ctaur/#social matatk: For RQTF to consider... janina1: Now we can reference it with our RTC comments. matatk: Is there anything objective to say about this? janina1: Hard to say. Simple solution: "Accommodate the people you have. Be mindful." CSS Update (Paul) janina1: Any other business? (none) Meeting is adjourned Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by [31]scribe.perl version 244 (Thu Feb 27 01:23:09 2025 UTC). [31] https://w3c.github.io/scribe2/scribedoc.html Diagnostics Succeeded: s/AOA/APA/ Succeeded: s/ITTF/RQTF/ Maybe present: Chiara, janina1 All speakers: chiace7, Chiara, janina1, matatk, PaulG, Roy_Ruoxi Active on IRC: chiace7, Gottfried, Gottfried_, janina, JonCohn, matatk, PaulG, Roy_Ruoxi
Attachments
- image/png attachment: image001.png
- image/jpeg attachment: image002.jpg
- image/png attachment: image003.png
Received on Wednesday, 12 March 2025 15:01:35 UTC