- From: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 17:10:52 -0400
- To: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
- Cc: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>, David Fazio <dfazio@helixopp.com>, "public-apa@w3.org" <public-apa@w3.org>, Atsushi Shimono <atsushi@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFmg2sV2YXeHwF8oNkqp4oW7mK2KtcUWB0aorjdNgZ4Fzt6hfA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Nigel, WAI-ADAPT - like you, most folks are looking for an "easy to say/remember" name, and as in most instances, people drop the WAI (as in WAI-ARIA vs. ARIA). Since both are emerging from the W3C, I think that that would be the concern. My $0.02 FWIW JF On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 12:48 PM Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> wrote: > Thanks both, I’ll feed this back to TTWG. > > > > For what it’s worth, we spent quite a while trying to find a good name > that did not clash with existing names that occupy a similar space, and > DAPT appeared to be unused. Since we pronounce it as dee-ay-pee-tee rather > than as “adapt” without the leading “a” I don’t think it ever occurred to > us that there could be a name clash with a different thing called ADAPT – I > can see how others might instinctively voice it differently though, and run > into this. > > > > Can I ask though: since a web search for ADAPT in relation to audio > description and dubbing shows no results on the two search engines I tried, > in the first 4 pages of results, can you spell out what the ADAPT is that > could cause unintended confusion here? > > > > Two sort-of-related things I found, neither of which is explicitly about > dubbing or audio description: > > - Is it the grassroots disability organisation described at > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ADAPT ? > - Or are you referring to WAI-Adapt https://www.w3.org/WAI/adapt/ ? > > > > Thanks for the suggestion of DADPT. I don’t personally like it because I > think it’s hard to say, and some degree of “trips off the tongue” is > generally a good thing, if it means people can discuss it more easily. > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Nigel > > > > > > *From: *John Foliot <john@foliot.ca> > *Date: *Monday, 17 July 2023 at 17:14 > *To: *David Fazio <dfazio@helixopp.com> > *Cc: *Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>, "public-apa@w3.org" < > public-apa@w3.org>, Atsushi Shimono <atsushi@w3.org> > *Subject: *Re: Wide Review request for DAPT > > > > I sadly concur with David Fazio - the naming issue here is problematic. > > Nigel, would the TT WG consider renaming this to DADPT (highling the D in > Description: Dubbing and Audio Description Profiles of TTML2) > > > > JF > > > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 10:16 AM David Fazio <dfazio@helixopp.com> wrote: > > I would seriously consider renaming this document. It’s confusing for > those of us that are familiar with “ADAPT”. > > > > 1. DAPT looks like a typo, as if it should be ADAPT > > > > 2. The very first sentence begins with A DAPT document. Again, it looks > like a typo where a space was included, after the A, by autocorrect. It > looks too much like ADAPT. > > This message was Sent from my iPhone. Please excuse any typographic > errors. > > > > On Jul 17, 2023, at 9:04 AM, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> wrote: > > Dear Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group, > > The W3C Timed Text Working Group (TTWG) (Charter > <https://www.w3.org/2023/04/timed-text-wg-charter.html#coordination>) > wishes to inform the Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group of the > Working Draft of the Dubbing and Audio description Profiles of TTML2 (DAPT) > Recommendation at https://www.w3.org/TR/dapt/ . > > DAPT is a TTML-based format for the exchange of transcripts and scripts > among authoring, prompting and playback tools in the localization and audio > description pipelines. A DAPT document is designed to carry pertinent > information for dubbing or audio description such as type of script, > dialogue, descriptions, timing, metadata, original language transcribed > text, translated text, language information, and audio mixing instructions, > and to be extensible to allow user-defined annotations or additional future > features. > > The TTWG invites feedback on DAPT and seeks input on the questions raised > as issues within the Working Draft, for example on whether it is important > to support direct embedding or external referencing of recorded audio. > > If you have feedback, we welcome it either in response to this message, or > as issues raised against the DAPT repository, at > https://github.com/w3c/dapt/issues/ , and request that any feedback is > provided by September 10th 2023. > > Please note that we will be making a separate Horizontal Review request to > APA WG as required by the Process in due course. > > Looking forward to hearing from you. > > Kind regards, > > Nigel Megitt, co-Chair W3C TTWG > > > > > > > -- > > *John Foliot* | > Senior Industry Specialist, Digital Accessibility | > W3C Accessibility Standards Contributor | > > "I made this so long because I did not have time to make it shorter." - > Pascal "links go places, buttons do things" > -- *John Foliot* | Senior Industry Specialist, Digital Accessibility | W3C Accessibility Standards Contributor | "I made this so long because I did not have time to make it shorter." - Pascal "links go places, buttons do things"
Received on Monday, 17 July 2023 21:11:14 UTC