- From: Matthew Atkinson <matkinson@tpgi.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 20:44:07 +0000
- To: W3C WAI Accessible Platform Architectures <public-apa@w3.org>
Hi all,
With thanks to Paul for taking minutes today, you can find them at https://www.w3.org/2023/02/22-apa-minutes and below in text form for convenience.
Best regards,
Matthew
– DRAFT –
APA Weekly Teleconference
22 February 2023
[2]IRC log.
[2] https://www.w3.org/2023/02/22-apa-irc
Attendees
Present
Fredrik, janina, matatk, PaulG, Roy
Regrets
Gottfried
Chair
Matthew
Scribe
matatk, PaulG
Contents
1. [3]Agenda Review & Announcements
2. [4]APA Rechartering - https://raw.githack.com/w3c/apa/
charter-2023/charter.html
3. [5]New Charters Review - https://github.com/w3c/strategy/
issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22Horizontal+review+
requested%22
4. [6]Explicit Review Requests - https://github.com/w3c/
a11y-request/issues
1. [7]Web of Things (WoT) Profile
5. [8]A11y Review Comment Tracker - https://w3c.github.io/
horizontal-issue-tracker/?repo=w3c/a11y-review
6. [9]New on TR - http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html
1. [10]Web Animations Level 2
7. [11]Explicit Review Requests - https://github.com/w3c/
a11y-request/issues
8. [12]CSS Update (Paul) - https://github.com/w3c/css-a11y/
issues
9. [13]New on TR - http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html
10. [14]Actions Checkin (Specs) - https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/
track/actions/open
11. [15]Dangling Spec Review Cleanup - https://www.w3.org/WAI/
APA/wiki/Category:Spec_Review_Assigned
Meeting minutes
Agenda Review & Announcements
matatk: I'll post to the list about my presentation
janina: I did a keynote presentation for Australia that will
also be available soon
APA Rechartering - [16]https://raw.githack.com/w3c/apa/charter-2023/
charter.html
[16] https://raw.githack.com/w3c/apa/charter-2023/charter.html
matatk: this is the version of our charter that's going to go
to CFC unless there's an objection among you
<janina> [17]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/
public-apa-admin/2023Feb/0025.html
[17] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa-admin/2023Feb/0025.html
matatk: FAST, deliverables, and work with external
organizations were updated in the document
janina: you have one week from today to comment and vote
New Charters Review - [18]https://github.com/w3c/strategy/
issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22Horizontal+review+requested%2
2
[18] https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues?q=is:issue+is:open+label:"Horizontal+review+requested"
Roy: no new charters
Explicit Review Requests - [19]https://github.com/w3c/a11y-request/
issues
[19] https://github.com/w3c/a11y-request/issues
Web of Things (WoT) Profile
<Roy> - issue: [20]w3c/a11y-request#54
[20] https://github.com/w3c/a11y-request/issues/54
<Roy> - tracking: [21]https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/
Web_of_Things_(WoT)_Profile
[21] https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Web_of_Things_(WoT)_Profile
<Roy> [22]https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/
Web_of_Things_(WoT)_Profile
[22] https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Web_of_Things_(WoT)_Profile
Roy: this was already reviewed in September 2 years ago
<Roy> [23]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/
2021Sep/0029.html
[23] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2021Sep/0029.html
janina: we wanted some expansions in the accessibility
considerations but I think we're fine with it
Roy: they want us to finish the review by March
janina: I will check on the comments
matatk: there was also a conversation at TPAC where we gave
them some feedbackl
janina: there are new specs (matter and thread) that will come
to market soon and help deal with these issues
janina: it's not the API that we will hold up
A11y Review Comment Tracker - [24]https://w3c.github.io/
horizontal-issue-tracker/?repo=w3c/a11y-review
[24] https://w3c.github.io/horizontal-issue-tracker/?repo=w3c/a11y-review
Roy: no new issues this week
New on TR - [25]http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html
[25] http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html
Web Animations Level 2
<Roy> - tracker: [26]https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/
Web_Animations_Level_2
[26] https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Web_Animations_Level_2
<Roy> - spec: [27]https://www.w3.org/TR/web-animations-2/
[27] https://www.w3.org/TR/web-animations-2/
PaulG: This is fairly low level
… Animations stil an issue for accessibility, but should be
covered by WCAG.
… No mention of accessibility in this document specifically.
… If we consider WCAG covers everything web, and they're just
adding APIs to control something web related, do they need to
explicitly reference WCAG?
… This is about providing more options for devs to do existing
things.
matatk: sometimes there's a parent doc to look at. But there's
already privacy and security considerations in here.
PaulG: ACK there are other non-functional requirements. Maybe
we could provide some boilerplate text for them to include
(around things like WCAG applying)?
janina: +1
PaulG: Should we give them the WAI Standards/guidelines link?
… Won't need updating on each iteration of the document.
can we use this for a "pointer" to applicable specs?
[28]https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/
[28] https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/
matatk: the immediate action is that we don't need to review
this but we do need to come up with a suggested text for
accessibility considerations
Explicit Review Requests - [29]https://github.com/w3c/a11y-request/
issues
[29] https://github.com/w3c/a11y-request/issues
<janina> [30]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/
2023Jan/0000.html
[30] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2023Jan/0000.html
janina: this is worth a read and covers parts of matter and
thread
matatk: this is long but we should forward it to them and
clearly state what we expect as an outcome
janina: should this be elevated to an APA concern and not just
comments from an individual?
matatk: we can't cfc this email as is but we probably can with
some small edits
Fredrik: should we just ask Gottfried again?
matatk: yes! Janina and I will do that!
CSS Update (Paul) - [31]https://github.com/w3c/css-a11y/issues
[31] https://github.com/w3c/css-a11y/issues
PaulG: There are ongoing conversations about color-contrast()
(not resolved)
… Propose we come up with the non-functional requirement
statement (discussed above) in the next week or so.
New on TR - [32]http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html
[32] http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html
Actions Checkin (Specs) - [33]https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/
actions/open
[33] https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/open
matatk: the tracker will be retired by the end of next month
matatk: let us know if you have issues about github being its
replacement
matatk: I still haven't seen anything in WCAG 2.2 that concerns
me so I think we can sign off on it
Fredrik: +1
Dangling Spec Review Cleanup - [34]https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/
Category:Spec_Review_Assigned
[34] https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Category:Spec_Review_Assigned
Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
[35]scribe.perl version 210 (Wed Jan 11 19:21:32 2023 UTC).
[35] https://w3c.github.io/scribe2/scribedoc.html
--
Matthew Tylee Atkinson (he/him)
--
Principal Accessibility Engineer
TPG Interactive
https://www.tpgi.com
A Vispero Company
https://www.vispero.com
--
This message is intended to be confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message from your system and notify us immediately.
Any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken or omitted to be taken by an unintended recipient in reliance on this message is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2023 20:44:24 UTC