- From: Gottfried Zimmermann \(Lists\) <zimmermann@accesstechnologiesgroup.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 19:02:21 +0100
- To: "'W3C WAI Accessible Platform Architectures'" <public-apa@w3.org>
HTML format: See https://www.w3.org/2020/02/26-apa-minutes.html.
Text format: See below.
Best regards,
Gottfried
___________________________________________________
Prof. Dr. Gottfried Zimmermann
Access Technologies Group, Germany
___________________________________________________
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
Accessible Platform Architectures (APA) Teleconference
26 Feb 2020
Attendees
Present
janina, Matthew_Atkinson, becka11y, JF, MichaelC, irfan,
becky, jasonjgw, Joshue_108_, Joanmarie_Diggs,
Gottfried, Joshue108_, Johnue108_, CharlesL
Regrets
Matthew
Chair
Janina
Scribe
Gottfried
Contents
* [2]Topics
1. [3]Agenda Review & Announcements
2. [4]WCAG 3.0 Mathematical Markup -- Open Discussion
3. [5]MathML and Chemistry Markup Update
4. [6]Task Force Updates -- Upcoming Publications
5. [7]New Charters Review
https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is
%3Aopen+label%3A%22Horizontal+review+requested%22
6. [8]new on TR
http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html
7. [9]Actions Checkin (Specs)
https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/products/8
* [10]Summary of Action Items
* [11]Summary of Resolutions
__________________________________________________________
<scribe> scribe: Gottfried
Agenda Review & Announcements
Janina: After this item, we are going to talk to the AG tf.
... Is WCAG 3.0 formal yet?
Michael: It is possible.
Janina: Any news?
Michael: Back at work. 5 working days to CSUN.
<JF> [12]https://doodle.com/poll/nacwpgxaeukfqzqi
[12] https://doodle.com/poll/nacwpgxaeukfqzqi
John: The doodle poll is open until Fri. For CSUN breakfast.
... We are about 13 or 14 persons now.
Janina: Individual checks
WCAG 3.0 Mathematical Markup -- Open Discussion
Charles: George is in another call, cannot join.
Janina: Color contrast. Trying to get smarter for calculating
color contrast. Spec must include calculations, and we need
mathematics for that.
... How can we present the formula for color contrast in the
spec in an accessible manner?
... Into the calculation go things like font weight, etc.
Developers will just run a tool. But the spec needs to provide
the mathematics for the tool builders.
... WCAG 3.0 will go in FPWG soon hopefully.
Charles: The math of calculating the color contrast has nothing
to do with how to present the formula.
John: Next generation spec will have formulas as part of the
normative text.
... What can we use? MathML? MathJax is the bridging solution
today.
Jason: Suggestion: Use MathJax to include MathML in any HTML5
doc. In a few years - at the time of the final publication -
browsers may support MathML.
... Question is not for the authors, but for how to store the
doc.
John: MathJax is just providing a polyfill?
Jason: Basically yes.
John: Do we have any capability to bring in MathJax lib in the
w3c publishing chain?
Janina: If we can include the script sourcing into the doc
header, the wgs can decide how to use it.
Jason: You can host the JavaScript lib on your own server - no
dependence.
Janina: That would be w3.org (own server)
Michael: We need to ask the web master about this.
... I suspect W3C would prefer to use MathML directly.
... We would need to get an exception for using MathJax.
Jason: You want the rendering on the client side.
... Polyfill happens on the client.
... MathJax also supports polyfilling on the server, but that
would create an accessibility issue.
Charles: This hinges on browser support for MathML - natively.
... Then you don't need the JavaScripting anymore.
... Chromium is starting to render MathML. There was a demo
last year. MathML refresh 4.0 is underway.
... They are adding support for accessibility, also reaching
out to chemistry.
Janina: Summary: For the FPWG (maybe a month away), we need
MathJax. We would prefer the source be in MathML - W3C spec.
... AT support is currently covered by the MathJax polyfill.
... When the spec goes to CR/PR, we may have native browser
support for MathML - at least for Chromium.
Gottfried: At some point in the future, may we just remove the
MathJax include?
Charles: yes, that is my understanding
Jason: yes. Progress also for Mozilla.
John: Weakest point is: Can we get MathJax integrated in the
spec?
... Are we going to make it in 2025?
Janina: Sure (smile).
... Who is going to make this request for including MathJax?
Michael: Request for using it in TR?
... That would be my job to talk to the web master.
... I need a clear description of the proposal.
... For now, edit the spec assuming it will go ahead.
... Either we get an exception for the filtering rules, or the
web master will propose a different solution.
Jason: If this path is not going forward, let's look at the
MathML specs - what they are doing.
... MathML 3 is on TR.
... MathML 4 is on a Git rep - community group.
Janina: We could reuse their scripts?
Jason: Look at version 3 which is on the TR page.
Charles: MathML 4 is driven by a community group right now. Not
clear whether the TR will be developed by the exiting wg or a
new wg.
... MathML 3.0.1 was published last week, fixing a bug.
... MathML that is put on to the page, must be done right.
... We have seen incorrect MathML syntax in epub documents.
Janina: We are talking months here. The exception is going to
be necessary for this spec.
Michael: MathML 3 uses a combination of images and MathML
rendering.
... Our approach will be forward-compatible - no waste of time.
Charles: Willing to help.
Jason: Also willing to help testing.
Charles: Does any of our specs display things like chemistry?
Janina: Not that i know.
... We are trying to support authors in styling formulas,
ensuring enough contrast etc.
... Content developers are going to run the tool.
Jason: Was the update on chemistry etc. related to this topic?
Janina: We haven't talked about this in APA for a while. But we
can take it up as a topic.
MathML and Chemistry Markup Update
Jason: MathML wg is working on accessibility support. They
intend to develop the MathML 4 spec.
... They also want to define the rules for rending MathML.
... The main issue for a11y lies in the semantic ambiguity for
mathematical presentation in MathML.
... They develop a system in which optional markup can define
meaning more precisely.
... The proposal under development would involve specific
semantics to be included on MathML elements.
... There is a doc by Neal Soiffer that identifies ambiguities.
... MathML community group wishes to distinguish chemistry
formulae from general mathematical expressions.
... The community group currently involves chemistry
specialists to help for disambiguation.
<CharlesL> Chemistry expressions / symbols semantics document
[13]https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1h-8k_bwQ1bO7gusb0O2
DfcEs0DZUAo6QVGYZuVjWVB8/edit#gid=0
[13]
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1h-8k_bwQ1bO7gusb0O2DfcEs0DZUAo6QVGYZ
uVjWVB8/edit#gid=0
Charles: This doc has the chemistry symbols and ambiguities.
... Trying to reduce the number of elements that are possibly
amibigious.
... People with chemistry knowledge are asked for input.
Jason: Trying to disambiguate by knowing the chemistry subfield
or other context.
<CharlesL> Here is the Github repo for the mathml refresh
[14]https://github.com/mathml-refresh
[14] https://github.com/mathml-refresh
Jason: WAI-ARIA is not being looked at because the problem is
not a primarily a11y issue.
Janina: Great to see this is moving along.
Task Force Updates -- Upcoming Publications
Janina: We have a cfc from Friday for the pronunciation tf.
Please respond.
... We are expecting more out of RQTF soon such as the new
RAUR.
Michael: It is impossible for me to do another doc before CSUN.
... I suggest to wait until after CSUN.
Janina: Agree.
Joshue: Should be okay. We did a lot of work, and we are in a
good place to publish RAUR after CSUN.
New Charters Review
[15]https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+lab
el%3A%22Horizontal+review+requested%22
[15]
https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues?q=is:issue+is:open+label:"Horizontal+
review+requested"
Michael: Wait a second....
<MichaelC> [16]https://www.w3.org/TR/xaur/
[16] https://www.w3.org/TR/xaur/
new on TR [17]http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html
[17] http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html
Actions Checkin (Specs)
[18]https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/products/8
[18] https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/products/8
action-2224?
<trackbot> action-2224 -- Gottfried Zimmermann to Review ttml
profiles for internet media subtitles and captions 1.2
[19]https://www.w3.org/tr/ttml-imsc1.2/ -- due 2019-12-11 --
OPEN
[19] https://www.w3.org/tr/ttml-imsc1.2/
<trackbot> [20]https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2224
[20] https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2224
Janina: We got proper consensus for action-2224.
<janina>
[21]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa-admin/2020F
eb/0018.html
[21]
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa-admin/2020Feb/0018.html
Janina: All text between <begin draft comment> and
</draft-comment> can be sent to the TTML wg.
... I will post it.
... Any other action items?
John: On bullet-chatting - i gave a quick-and-dirty writeup.
... Watching a tv and streaming chat messages as an overlay
over the video.
... Multiple pieces of text showing on the screen.
... Also display on a big wall at conferences.
... There are already doing this in multiple places.
<janina>
[22]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2020Feb/001
4.html
[22] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2020Feb/0014.html
John: It is a mess regarding a11y.
Janina: I think we have general consensus as John summarized
it.
... I will bring this into coordination group.
John: Can i close the action item?
Janina: yes
... Meeting adjourned
Summary of Action Items
Summary of Resolutions
[End of minutes]
__________________________________________________________
Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
David Booth's [23]scribe.perl version 1.154 ([24]CVS log)
$Date: 2020/02/26 18:01:19 $
__________________________________________________________
[23] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[24] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Scribe.perl diagnostic output
[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.154 of Date: 2018/09/25 16:35:56
Check for newer version at [25]http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/
scribe/
[25] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/
Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00)
Succeeded: s/Josh/John/g
Succeeded: s/0epub/epub/
Succeeded: s/specs/documents/
Succeeded: s/Seyfer?/Soiffer/
Succeeded: s/We are expecting more out of RQ soon./We are expecting more
out of RQTF soon such as the new RAUR./
Succeeded: s/ and we are in a good place for after CSUN./ and we are in
a good place to publish RAUR after CSUN./
Succeeded: s/There are no new charter issues/Wait a second.../
Default Present: janina, Matthew_Atkinson, becka11y, JF, MichaelC, irfan
, becky, jasonjgw, Joshue_108_, Joanmarie_Diggs, Gottfried, Joshue108_
Present: janina Matthew_Atkinson becka11y JF MichaelC irfan becky jasonj
gw Joshue_108_ Joanmarie_Diggs Gottfried Joshue108_ Johnue108_ CharlesL
Regrets: Matthew
Found Scribe: Gottfried
Inferring ScribeNick: Gottfried
WARNING: No date found! Assuming today. (Hint: Specify
the W3C IRC log URL, and the date will be determined from that.)
Or specify the date like this:
<dbooth> Date: 12 Sep 2002
People with action items:
WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this
warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain
a link to the original IRC log.)
[End of [26]scribe.perl diagnostic output]
[26] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
Received on Wednesday, 26 February 2020 18:02:40 UTC