- From: Gottfried Zimmermann \(Lists\) <zimmermann@accesstechnologiesgroup.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 19:02:21 +0100
- To: "'W3C WAI Accessible Platform Architectures'" <public-apa@w3.org>
HTML format: See https://www.w3.org/2020/02/26-apa-minutes.html. Text format: See below. Best regards, Gottfried ___________________________________________________ Prof. Dr. Gottfried Zimmermann Access Technologies Group, Germany ___________________________________________________ [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ - DRAFT - Accessible Platform Architectures (APA) Teleconference 26 Feb 2020 Attendees Present janina, Matthew_Atkinson, becka11y, JF, MichaelC, irfan, becky, jasonjgw, Joshue_108_, Joanmarie_Diggs, Gottfried, Joshue108_, Johnue108_, CharlesL Regrets Matthew Chair Janina Scribe Gottfried Contents * [2]Topics 1. [3]Agenda Review & Announcements 2. [4]WCAG 3.0 Mathematical Markup -- Open Discussion 3. [5]MathML and Chemistry Markup Update 4. [6]Task Force Updates -- Upcoming Publications 5. [7]New Charters Review https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is %3Aopen+label%3A%22Horizontal+review+requested%22 6. [8]new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html 7. [9]Actions Checkin (Specs) https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/products/8 * [10]Summary of Action Items * [11]Summary of Resolutions __________________________________________________________ <scribe> scribe: Gottfried Agenda Review & Announcements Janina: After this item, we are going to talk to the AG tf. ... Is WCAG 3.0 formal yet? Michael: It is possible. Janina: Any news? Michael: Back at work. 5 working days to CSUN. <JF> [12]https://doodle.com/poll/nacwpgxaeukfqzqi [12] https://doodle.com/poll/nacwpgxaeukfqzqi John: The doodle poll is open until Fri. For CSUN breakfast. ... We are about 13 or 14 persons now. Janina: Individual checks WCAG 3.0 Mathematical Markup -- Open Discussion Charles: George is in another call, cannot join. Janina: Color contrast. Trying to get smarter for calculating color contrast. Spec must include calculations, and we need mathematics for that. ... How can we present the formula for color contrast in the spec in an accessible manner? ... Into the calculation go things like font weight, etc. Developers will just run a tool. But the spec needs to provide the mathematics for the tool builders. ... WCAG 3.0 will go in FPWG soon hopefully. Charles: The math of calculating the color contrast has nothing to do with how to present the formula. John: Next generation spec will have formulas as part of the normative text. ... What can we use? MathML? MathJax is the bridging solution today. Jason: Suggestion: Use MathJax to include MathML in any HTML5 doc. In a few years - at the time of the final publication - browsers may support MathML. ... Question is not for the authors, but for how to store the doc. John: MathJax is just providing a polyfill? Jason: Basically yes. John: Do we have any capability to bring in MathJax lib in the w3c publishing chain? Janina: If we can include the script sourcing into the doc header, the wgs can decide how to use it. Jason: You can host the JavaScript lib on your own server - no dependence. Janina: That would be w3.org (own server) Michael: We need to ask the web master about this. ... I suspect W3C would prefer to use MathML directly. ... We would need to get an exception for using MathJax. Jason: You want the rendering on the client side. ... Polyfill happens on the client. ... MathJax also supports polyfilling on the server, but that would create an accessibility issue. Charles: This hinges on browser support for MathML - natively. ... Then you don't need the JavaScripting anymore. ... Chromium is starting to render MathML. There was a demo last year. MathML refresh 4.0 is underway. ... They are adding support for accessibility, also reaching out to chemistry. Janina: Summary: For the FPWG (maybe a month away), we need MathJax. We would prefer the source be in MathML - W3C spec. ... AT support is currently covered by the MathJax polyfill. ... When the spec goes to CR/PR, we may have native browser support for MathML - at least for Chromium. Gottfried: At some point in the future, may we just remove the MathJax include? Charles: yes, that is my understanding Jason: yes. Progress also for Mozilla. John: Weakest point is: Can we get MathJax integrated in the spec? ... Are we going to make it in 2025? Janina: Sure (smile). ... Who is going to make this request for including MathJax? Michael: Request for using it in TR? ... That would be my job to talk to the web master. ... I need a clear description of the proposal. ... For now, edit the spec assuming it will go ahead. ... Either we get an exception for the filtering rules, or the web master will propose a different solution. Jason: If this path is not going forward, let's look at the MathML specs - what they are doing. ... MathML 3 is on TR. ... MathML 4 is on a Git rep - community group. Janina: We could reuse their scripts? Jason: Look at version 3 which is on the TR page. Charles: MathML 4 is driven by a community group right now. Not clear whether the TR will be developed by the exiting wg or a new wg. ... MathML 3.0.1 was published last week, fixing a bug. ... MathML that is put on to the page, must be done right. ... We have seen incorrect MathML syntax in epub documents. Janina: We are talking months here. The exception is going to be necessary for this spec. Michael: MathML 3 uses a combination of images and MathML rendering. ... Our approach will be forward-compatible - no waste of time. Charles: Willing to help. Jason: Also willing to help testing. Charles: Does any of our specs display things like chemistry? Janina: Not that i know. ... We are trying to support authors in styling formulas, ensuring enough contrast etc. ... Content developers are going to run the tool. Jason: Was the update on chemistry etc. related to this topic? Janina: We haven't talked about this in APA for a while. But we can take it up as a topic. MathML and Chemistry Markup Update Jason: MathML wg is working on accessibility support. They intend to develop the MathML 4 spec. ... They also want to define the rules for rending MathML. ... The main issue for a11y lies in the semantic ambiguity for mathematical presentation in MathML. ... They develop a system in which optional markup can define meaning more precisely. ... The proposal under development would involve specific semantics to be included on MathML elements. ... There is a doc by Neal Soiffer that identifies ambiguities. ... MathML community group wishes to distinguish chemistry formulae from general mathematical expressions. ... The community group currently involves chemistry specialists to help for disambiguation. <CharlesL> Chemistry expressions / symbols semantics document [13]https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1h-8k_bwQ1bO7gusb0O2 DfcEs0DZUAo6QVGYZuVjWVB8/edit#gid=0 [13] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1h-8k_bwQ1bO7gusb0O2DfcEs0DZUAo6QVGYZ uVjWVB8/edit#gid=0 Charles: This doc has the chemistry symbols and ambiguities. ... Trying to reduce the number of elements that are possibly amibigious. ... People with chemistry knowledge are asked for input. Jason: Trying to disambiguate by knowing the chemistry subfield or other context. <CharlesL> Here is the Github repo for the mathml refresh [14]https://github.com/mathml-refresh [14] https://github.com/mathml-refresh Jason: WAI-ARIA is not being looked at because the problem is not a primarily a11y issue. Janina: Great to see this is moving along. Task Force Updates -- Upcoming Publications Janina: We have a cfc from Friday for the pronunciation tf. Please respond. ... We are expecting more out of RQTF soon such as the new RAUR. Michael: It is impossible for me to do another doc before CSUN. ... I suggest to wait until after CSUN. Janina: Agree. Joshue: Should be okay. We did a lot of work, and we are in a good place to publish RAUR after CSUN. New Charters Review [15]https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+lab el%3A%22Horizontal+review+requested%22 [15] https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues?q=is:issue+is:open+label:"Horizontal+ review+requested" Michael: Wait a second.... <MichaelC> [16]https://www.w3.org/TR/xaur/ [16] https://www.w3.org/TR/xaur/ new on TR [17]http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html [17] http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html Actions Checkin (Specs) [18]https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/products/8 [18] https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/products/8 action-2224? <trackbot> action-2224 -- Gottfried Zimmermann to Review ttml profiles for internet media subtitles and captions 1.2 [19]https://www.w3.org/tr/ttml-imsc1.2/ -- due 2019-12-11 -- OPEN [19] https://www.w3.org/tr/ttml-imsc1.2/ <trackbot> [20]https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2224 [20] https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2224 Janina: We got proper consensus for action-2224. <janina> [21]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa-admin/2020F eb/0018.html [21] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa-admin/2020Feb/0018.html Janina: All text between <begin draft comment> and </draft-comment> can be sent to the TTML wg. ... I will post it. ... Any other action items? John: On bullet-chatting - i gave a quick-and-dirty writeup. ... Watching a tv and streaming chat messages as an overlay over the video. ... Multiple pieces of text showing on the screen. ... Also display on a big wall at conferences. ... There are already doing this in multiple places. <janina> [22]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2020Feb/001 4.html [22] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2020Feb/0014.html John: It is a mess regarding a11y. Janina: I think we have general consensus as John summarized it. ... I will bring this into coordination group. John: Can i close the action item? Janina: yes ... Meeting adjourned Summary of Action Items Summary of Resolutions [End of minutes] __________________________________________________________ Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by David Booth's [23]scribe.perl version 1.154 ([24]CVS log) $Date: 2020/02/26 18:01:19 $ __________________________________________________________ [23] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm [24] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/ Scribe.perl diagnostic output [Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.] This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.154 of Date: 2018/09/25 16:35:56 Check for newer version at [25]http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ scribe/ [25] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/Josh/John/g Succeeded: s/0epub/epub/ Succeeded: s/specs/documents/ Succeeded: s/Seyfer?/Soiffer/ Succeeded: s/We are expecting more out of RQ soon./We are expecting more out of RQTF soon such as the new RAUR./ Succeeded: s/ and we are in a good place for after CSUN./ and we are in a good place to publish RAUR after CSUN./ Succeeded: s/There are no new charter issues/Wait a second.../ Default Present: janina, Matthew_Atkinson, becka11y, JF, MichaelC, irfan , becky, jasonjgw, Joshue_108_, Joanmarie_Diggs, Gottfried, Joshue108_ Present: janina Matthew_Atkinson becka11y JF MichaelC irfan becky jasonj gw Joshue_108_ Joanmarie_Diggs Gottfried Joshue108_ Johnue108_ CharlesL Regrets: Matthew Found Scribe: Gottfried Inferring ScribeNick: Gottfried WARNING: No date found! Assuming today. (Hint: Specify the W3C IRC log URL, and the date will be determined from that.) Or specify the date like this: <dbooth> Date: 12 Sep 2002 People with action items: WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.) [End of [26]scribe.perl diagnostic output] [26] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
Received on Wednesday, 26 February 2020 18:02:40 UTC