- From: Gottfried Zimmermann \(Lists\) <zimmermann@accesstechnologiesgroup.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 19:06:19 +0200
- To: "'W3C WAI Accessible Platform Architectures'" <public-apa@w3.org>
HTML format: https://www.w3.org/2019/10/09-apa-minutes.html
Text format: See below.
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: Becky to review Mini-App white paper
Best regards,
Gottfried
___________________________________________________
Prof. Dr. Gottfried Zimmermann
Access Technologies Group, Germany
___________________________________________________
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group Teleconference
09 Oct 2019
Attendees
Present
janina, Joanmarie_Diggs, Matthew_Atkinson, MichaelC,
interaccess, IanPouncey, Irfan, CharlesL, Roy,
Joshue108_, Manishearth, kip, Gottfried, MichaelC_
Regrets
Chair
janina
Scribe
Gottfried
Contents
* [2]Topics
1. [3]Agenda Review & Announcements
2. [4]Workshop Updates
3. [5]Task Force Updates
4. [6]Horizontal reviews
https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is
%3Aopen+label%3A%22Horizontal+review+requested%22
5. [7]new on TR
http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html
6. [8]Actions Checkin (Specs)
https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/products/8
7. [9]Community Groups Tracking Review
https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Community_Groups
* [10]Summary of Action Items
* [11]Summary of Resolutions
__________________________________________________________
<scribe> scribe: Gottfried
<Becka11y> presesnt+
Agenda Review & Announcements
Matthew: We should touch on the HTML review
Janina: Yes.
... W3C workshop on inclusive immersive web. Deadline has been
extended until Fri.
Workshop Updates
Task Force Updates
Janina: Still figuring out what is the language for the
accessibility impact section is.
... Discussion on RQTF list.
<janina>
[12]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rqtf/2019Oct/00
14.html
[12] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rqtf/2019Oct/0014.html
Janina: CfC consensus today for the audio book spec. It is
basically a manifest.
Horizontal reviews
[13]https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+lab
el%3A%22Horizontal+review+requested%22
[13] https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues?q=is:issue+is:open+label:"Horizontal+review+requested"
<MichaelC> [14]Second Screen WG draft charter
[14] https://w3c.github.io/secondscreen-charter/
Michael: We provided input before.
... Liaison statement to APA.
... Any comments?
Janina: Concerned about their turn-around in members. We might
want to update them on the previous comments we had.
Michael: Looks like we don't need to comment
<MichaelC> [15]Verifiable Claims draft charter
[15] https://w3c.github.io/charter-drafts/verifiable-credential-2019.html
Michael: They are switching from development to maintenance
mode.
Janina: Publishing had some comments.
Michael: Charter has a liaison statement to us.
<MichaelC> [16]Web of Things draft charter
[16] http://w3c.github.io/wot/charters/wot-wg-charter-draft-2019.html
Michael: Staff contact is Kazuyuki Ashimura. They have a
liaison statement to us.
new on TR [17]http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html
[17] http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html
Michael: Things were left over from last week.
<MichaelC> [18]MiniApp Standardization White Paper
[18] https://www.w3.org/TR/mini-app-white-paper/
Michael: I feel would be good have people not from China
reviewing it.
Becky: I can do it.
<MichaelC> ACTION: Becky to review Mini-App white paper
<trackbot> Created ACTION-2214 - Review mini-app white paper
[on Becky Gibson - due 2019-10-16].
<MichaelC> action-2214:
[19]https://www.w3.org/TR/mini-app-white-paper/ MiniApp
Standardization White Paper
[19] https://www.w3.org/TR/mini-app-white-paper/
<trackbot> Notes added to action-2214 Review mini-app white
paper.
Michael: You are likely to raise questions more than formal
comments.
<MichaelC> action-2214:
[20]https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/MiniApp_Standardization_Whi
te_Paper
[20] https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/MiniApp_Standardization_White_Paper
<trackbot> Notes added to action-2214 Review mini-app white
paper.
[21]https://www.w3.org/TR/2019/NOTE-vc-use-cases-20190924/
Verifiable Credentials Use Cases
[21] https://www.w3.org/TR/2019/NOTE-vc-use-cases-20190924/
Michael: They believe they addressed the issues.
<MichaelC> [22]Accessibility issues filed in verifiable claims
[22] https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues?utf8=✓&q=is:issue+is:closed+accessibility
Michael: But they didn't inform us about this.
... We need to look if we are satisfied with that.
Janina: The original comments were from Tzvaya.
... Can we contact her about this?
<MichaelC> [23]Verifiable Credentials Data Model 1.0
[23] https://www.w3.org/TR/verifiable-claims-data-model/
Michael: They may go to CR soon - better rush.
Actions Checkin (Specs)
[24]https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/products/8
[24] https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/products/8
<Matthew_Atkinson> Update on my proposal for how to go about
the HTML review (this builds on Léonie's suggested PRs that are
tagged as relating to accessibility):
[25]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2019Oct/001
3.html
[25] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2019Oct/0013.html
<Joshue108_> great stuff Matt
<Joshue108_> we do.
Matthew: I created a few shell scripts to find out about the
critical commits.
... The process should work now.
... There are 365 commits - mostly small.
... Ignoring editorial changes.
... Will start with PRs pointed to be Leonie.
... Working on it.
Janina: These scripts may be useful for other purposes as well.
Becky: I looked at the commits marked with "accessibility".
... Quite a work to read through all this.
Matthew: Later commits may overwrite earlier commits - that may
be wasting time for us.
... But i didn't find a better way.
... We should not file any issue before we got through the full
list of commits.
... The more people looking at it the better.
... If you have comments on a PR, write the to list, so i can
accommodate it.
... I will follow this through.
Janina: At TPAC, somebody pointed out that a good practice is
for groups to write a note about what they finally changed.
<Joshue108_> +1
Michael: That is what WhatWG does.
Matthew: Open the commit on command line tools vs. on Github.
Need a URL for the pull request.
... Will see if this works reliably.
Janina: The getgit? command should show a bunch of commits.
Matthew: Looked at that. But looking at commits immediately in
the browser.
Michael: You might help to improve our horizontal review
process.
Janina: Simple stuff is the best.
... There was a meeting at TPAC on this. All groups on
horizontal reviews need better tooling.
Community Groups Tracking Review
[26]https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Community_Groups
[26] https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Community_Groups
Becky: I updated the ones we talked about last time.
BD Comics Manga, [27]https://www.w3.org/community/bdcomacg/
[27] https://www.w3.org/community/bdcomacg/
Janina: I think we have an interest.
... WAI-CC call needs to assign this to a person.
Voter Decision Systems,
[28]https://www.w3.org/community/voter-decision-support/
[28] https://www.w3.org/community/voter-decision-support/
Becky: No need to track.
Notation 3 (N3), [29]https://www.w3.org/community/n3-dev/
[29] https://www.w3.org/community/n3-dev/
Becky: NO need to track.
ARIA and Assistive Technologies,
[30]https://www.w3.org/community/aria-at/
[30] https://www.w3.org/community/aria-at/
Becky: We need to track, although ARIA should track.
Michael: This is coordinated with the ARIA Implementation
Practices, so no need to track for APA.
Bibframe2Schema.org,
[31]https://www.w3.org/community/bibframe2schema/
[31] https://www.w3.org/community/bibframe2schema/
Becky: no need to track
Janina: Agree
Gottfried: Does this involve the accessibility extension of
schema.org?
Janina: This is for bibliographic citation.
Gottfried: Should be fine then.
web Video Map Tracks (WebVMT),
[32]https://www.w3.org/community/webvmt-cg/
[32] https://www.w3.org/community/webvmt-cg/
Becky: We should track this, i think.
... Only 2 participants.
... stream video with location data, etc.
... I can look into it more.
Janina: Let's skip it for now - only if it grows we need to
track.
... Check again in a year.
Knowledge Graph Construction,
[33]https://www.w3.org/community/kg-construct/
[33] https://www.w3.org/community/kg-construct/
Becky: Don't know what R2RML language is.
... Looks like pulling out data, not really visual.
Janina: Sounds like a database thing.
... Don't need to worry about.
Becky: Was also my thought.
Computational Legal Description Support,
[34]https://www.w3.org/community/clads/
[34] https://www.w3.org/community/clads/
Becky: No need to track. No participants.
Janina: Agree
ceddl html attribute-based markup and javascript api,
[35]https://www.w3.org/community/ceddl-webspec/
[35] https://www.w3.org/community/ceddl-webspec/
Customer Experience Digital Data Layer.
Becky: No need to track.
... Sounds like website personalization.
Janina: What do they mean by personalization. Targeting their
ads?
... That's a question mark.
Becky: I can look into this more.
... Came out in March, and they have 3 participants.
Michael: If they produce a spec, then we should look into this.
Should look at it later.
Janina: Agree.
Michael: Catch them in development before they go too far.
Schema Extensions for IoT,
[36]https://www.w3.org/community/iotschema/
[36] https://www.w3.org/community/iotschema/
Becky: We should be aware of this.
Michael: We might want to impact this.
... Via Josh and RQTF.
Janina: RQTF can be assignee.
MathML Extensions, [37]https://www.w3.org/community/mathml4/
[37] https://www.w3.org/community/mathml4/
Janina: There is already disability participation.
... No need to track for us - already being taken care of.
Becky: Can we later sort by assignee?
Janina: We can think about this. Maybe Judy has a suggestion.
Becky: At least it should sort by the last update date.
Talent MarketPlace Signaling,
[38]https://www.w3.org/community/talent-signal/
[38] https://www.w3.org/community/talent-signal/
Becky: No need to track.
... What is signaling?
... Maybe we do need to track so that they do not call out
properties that reveal disability.
Janina: I do not see a particular problem here. We can come
back when problems come up.
SVG, [39]https://www.w3.org/community/svgcg/
[39] https://www.w3.org/community/svgcg/
Becky: No need to track.
Janina: Agree.
actions?
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: Becky to review Mini-App white paper
Summary of Resolutions
[End of minutes]
__________________________________________________________
Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
David Booth's [40]scribe.perl version 1.154 ([41]CVS log)
$Date: 2019/10/09 17:05:27 $
__________________________________________________________
[40] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[41] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Scribe.perl diagnostic output
[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.154 of Date: 2018/09/25 16:35:56
Check for newer version at [42]http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/
scribe/
[42] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/
Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00)
Succeeded: s/65/365/
Succeeded: s/the/to/
Default Present: janina, Joanmarie_Diggs, Matthew_Atkinson, MichaelC, in
teraccess, IanPouncey, Irfan, CharlesL, Roy, Joshue108_, Manishearth, ki
p
Present: janina Joanmarie_Diggs Matthew_Atkinson MichaelC interaccess Ia
nPouncey Irfan CharlesL Roy Joshue108_ Manishearth kip Gottfried Michael
C_
Found Scribe: Gottfried
Inferring ScribeNick: Gottfried
Found Date: 09 Oct 2019
People with action items: becky
WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this
warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain
a link to the original IRC log.)
[End of [43]scribe.perl diagnostic output]
[43] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
Received on Wednesday, 9 October 2019 17:06:31 UTC