- From: John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 13:40:48 -0500
- To: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
- Cc: George Kerscher <kerscher@montana.com>, Joshue O Connor <joconnor@w3.org>, W3C WAI Accessible Platform Architectures <public-apa@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKdCpxzWnhKeZVibVV126p5oMhdHx=Y1DLyLsN_4N=8KH_5zzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Sounds good to me. JF On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 1:33 PM Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> wrote: > So, our prime complaint and remediation is explanatory Summary/Details. > That's the required WCAG conformance on this W3C document, and I think > it matters a lot in this instance in particular. > > Secondary is the use of accessible SVG. It's secondary because it's an > emerging technology. Yes, we should eat our own dog food, but perhaps > the dog food is missing some essential nutrients? Therefore, it's > secondary and we don't fall on our swords over SVG. > > Sound right? > > John Foliot writes: > > My vote would be for both, given that the major argument we got from > "back > > in the day" (ref: the attribute I am not allow to speak of out loud) is > > that these extended descriptions should be available to all users, and > not > > just screen reader users... > > > > (Additionally, and I've not kept track, is how accessible are accessible > > SVGs? It seems, as Joshue noted, that there is both a complex visual > > representation, but the bigger challenge is also explaining the > > relationships in that representation). > > > > JF > > > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 12:39 PM Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> > wrote: > > > > > I wonder whether it would be most prudent to push for both accessible > > > SVG and Summary/Details explanatory text? > > > > > > George Kerscher writes: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I think that there may be at least two good alternatives for complex > > > > graphics. SVG, as you suggest and I am looking forward to guidance on > > > these. > > > > > > > > In addition there is the extended description approach, where a > textual > > > > description may be more appropriate. We have collected some > approaches in > > > > the extended description EPUB you can download from: > > > > http://www.epubtest.org/testbooks > > > > This takes advantage of the details element with its expanding and > > > > collapsing nature. This may be less intrusive to the reader, and > yet > > > it is > > > > available to anybody who wants more information. > > > > > > > > Best > > > > George > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Janina Sajka (janina@rednote.net) <janina@rednote.net> > > > > Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2019 8:18 AM > > > > To: Joshue O Connor <joconnor@w3.org> > > > > Cc: W3C WAI Accessible Platform Architectures <public-apa@w3.org> > > > > Subject: Re: @alt descriptions for Thing Descriptions > > > > > > > > Long descriptions? Nah, we killed those with HTML 5, right? Who needs > > > > those! <grin> > > > > > > > > On a serious note, should we be recommending these be SVG so that we > can > > > > use accessible SVG and someone can actually explore the relationship > > > > matrix directly? > > > > > > > > Joshue O Connor writes: > > > > > On 13/06/2019 15:03, Janina Sajka (janina@rednote.net) wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hey, Josh: > > > > > > > > > > > > +APA list > > > > > > > > > > > > So, you're more the expert on WCAG requirements for such "things, > > > ..." > > > > > > ----- Sorry, couldn't resist! > > > > > > > > > > Boom Boom! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Question: Are these detailed in the text otherwise provided by > the > > > spec? > > > > > > > > > > Not really, or at least the visual representation shows how > objects, > > > > classes > > > > > and instances of same relate to each other. > > > > > > > > > > There are lots of nodes and arrows showing relationships. I'll > have a > > > go > > > > at > > > > > abstracting them out and will forward to the list. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If so, simply giving good alt should be sufficient, > > > > > > > > > > These are for sure in the @longdesc section *grin. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > Josh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > right? Else, yes > > > > > > please! > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > > > > > > Janina > > > > > > > > > > > > Joshue O Connor writes: > > > > > > > Hi Janina, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm reviewing the Thing Description in more detail and have > looked > > > at > > > > the > > > > > > > figures contained in it. There are ~5. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The @alt for 4 of them is 'UML diagram of the TD information > model > > > for > > > > the > > > > > > > hypermedia controls vocabulary' and they represent: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Figure1TD core vocabulary, > > > > > > > Figure2JSON schema vocabulary > > > > > > > Figure3WoT security vocabulary > > > > > > > Figure4Hypermedia controls vocabulary > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you want me to write up in detail the UML descriptions? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > They take the form: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <example> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thing (linking to Form/Link/Multilanguage/VersionInfo) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @context :anyURL (or Array) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @type: string > > > > > > > > > > > > > > id: anyURI > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > </example> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > They are a little gnarly to describe but I can do it if you > need > > > it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Whereas one of them represents a representation of a 'TD > > > > Serialization, TD > > > > > > > and Thing on a light switch example' which is again a JSON type > > > > > > > visualisation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok, it will take a little time, but that's ok if its helpful to > > > you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Josh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Emerging Web Technology Specialist/A11y (WAI/W3C) > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Emerging Web Technology Specialist/A11y (WAI/W3C) > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Janina Sajka > > > > > > > > Linux Foundation Fellow > > > > Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org > > > > > > > > The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative > (WAI) > > > > Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures > http://www.w3.org/wai/apa > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Janina Sajka > > > > > > Linux Foundation Fellow > > > Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org > > > > > > The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) > > > Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures > http://www.w3.org/wai/apa > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > *John Foliot* | Principal Accessibility Strategist | W3C AC > Representative > > Deque Systems - Accessibility for Good > > deque.com > > -- > > Janina Sajka > > Linux Foundation Fellow > Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org > > The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) > Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures http://www.w3.org/wai/apa > > -- *John Foliot* | Principal Accessibility Strategist | W3C AC Representative Deque Systems - Accessibility for Good deque.com
Received on Thursday, 13 June 2019 18:41:53 UTC